On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 03:39:08PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
Add a member "bp_priv" at the end of the uapi struct perf_event_attr
to make a bridge between ptrace and hardware breakpoint.
This is preparation for later patch on some archs such as ARM, ARM64
and LoongArch which have privilege level of breakpoint.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 3 +++
kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index 3a64499b0f5d..f9f917e854e6 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ enum perf_event_read_format {
#define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER6 120 /* add: aux_sample_size */
#define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER7 128 /* add: sig_data */
#define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER8 136 /* add: config3 */
+#define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER9 144 /* add: bp_priv */
/*
* Hardware event_id to monitor via a performance monitoring event:
@@ -522,6 +523,8 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
__u64 sig_data;
__u64 config3; /* extension of config2 */
+
+ __u8 bp_priv; /* privilege level of breakpoint */
};
Why are we extending the user ABI for this? Perf events already have the
privilege encoded (indirectly) by the exclude_{user,kernel,hv} fields in
'struct perf_event_attr'.