Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250: don't lost port's default capabilities

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 04:29:28PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Commit b0b8c84cf58d ("serial: of_serial: Handle auto-flow-control
> property") added support for fifo-size and hw-flow-control properties
> to avoid adding new types to 8250.c for UARTs that are compatible with
> the standard types but that have different size fifo or support 16750
> compatible auto flow control. We avoided many new 8250 port types with
> this nice feature, but there's a problem, if the code detects fifo-size
> or auto-flow-control property, up->capabilities will be set
> accordingly, then serial8250_set_defaults() will ignore the default
> port's capabilities:
> 
> |if (!up->capabilities)
> |	up->capabilities = uart_config[type].flags;
> 
> If the port's default capabilities contains other bits such as
> UART_CAP_SLEEP, UART_CAP_EFR and so on, they are lost.
> 
> Fixes: b0b8c84cf58d ("serial: of_serial: Handle auto-flow-control property")
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an
  older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the
  signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be
  applied to any older kernel releases.  To properly fix this, please
  follow the documented rules in the
  Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve
  this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot