Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] iio: adc: ad7606: switch mutexes to scoped_guard

[Markus Elfring]

> Switching to scoped_guard simplifies the code and avoids to take care to
> unlock the mutex in case of premature return.

Can such a change description become more imperative?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc6#n94


…
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606.c
…
> @@ -124,19 +122,19 @@ static irqreturn_t ad7606_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
…
>  	ret = ad7606_read_samples(st);
> -	if (ret == 0)
> -		iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, st->data,
> -						   iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto error_ret;
>
> +	iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, st->data,
> +					   iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev));
> +error_ret:
>  	iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
…

I find that these control flow adjustments do not fit to the changelog.
They can be offered in another update step (on demand), can't they?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc6#n81


There are no scoped_guard() calls performed in your patch.
How do you think about to use a summary phrase like “Switch mutex calls to mutex guard usage”?

Regards,
Markus