Re: [PATCH 2/2] LoongArch: Add support for relocating the kernel with RELR relocation

From: Huacai Chen
Date: Sat Jul 06 2024 - 09:49:56 EST


On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 6:34 PM Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2024-07-06 at 18:29 +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
>
> /* snip */
>
> > > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> > > index ddc042895d01..03b3ef5edd24 100644
> > > --- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> > > @@ -607,6 +607,7 @@ config ARCH_HAS_GENERIC_CRASHKERNEL_RESERVATION
> > >
> > > config RELOCATABLE
> > > bool "Relocatable kernel"
> > > + select ARCH_HAS_RELR
> > Why is this selection under RELOCATABLE? I know ARM64 is the same, but
> > why?
>
> Because if we just select it in CONFIG_LOONGARCH instead of
> CONFIG_RELOCATABLE, the users who have disabled CONFIG_RELOCATABLE will
> still see the entry for RELR in their configuration interface. And
> they'll ask "hey what's this for? Why my kernel needs relocation?"
RELR is not a similar conception to RELA, it is only used for
relocatable kernel?

Huacai

>
> --
> Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University