Re: deconflicting new syscall numbers for 6.11

[Zack Weinberg]

Without commenting on the rest of this...

On Sat, Jul 6, 2024, at 6:01 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> The arc4random implementation in glibc was never intended to displace
> randomness generation for cryptographic purposes.

...arc4random on the BSDs (particularly on OpenBSD) *is* intended to be
suitable for cryptographic purposes, and, simultaneously, intended to be
fast enough that user space programs should never hesitate to use it.
Therefore, Linux+glibc needs to be prepared for user space programs to
use it that way -- expecting both speed and cryptographic strength --
or else we shouldn't have added it at all.

zw