Re: [RFC PATCH v3] ptp: Add vDSO-style vmclock support

[Simon Horman]

On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 04:14:39PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The vmclock "device" provides a shared memory region with precision clock
> information. By using shared memory, it is safe across Live Migration.
> 
> Like the KVM PTP clock, this can convert TSC-based cross timestamps into
> KVM clock values. Unlike the KVM PTP clock, it does so only when such is
> actually helpful.
> 
> The memory region of the device is also exposed to userspace so it can be
> read or memory mapped by application which need reliable notification of
> clock disruptions.
> 
> The shared memory structure is intended to be adopted into the nascent
> virtio-rtc specification (since one might consider a virtio-rtc
> specification that doesn't fix the live migration problem to be not fit
> for purpose). It can also be presented via a simple ACPI device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

...

> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_vmclock.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_vmclock.c

...

> +	/* If there is valid clock information, register a PTP clock */
> +	if (st->cs_id) {
> +		st->ptp_clock_info = ptp_vmclock_info;
> +		strncpy(st->ptp_clock_info.name, st->name, sizeof(st->ptp_clock_info.name));

Hi David,

As per my comment on v2, although it is harmless in this case,
it would be nicer to use strscpy() here and avoid fortification warnings.


...