[PATCH 07/10] perf/uprobe: Convert (some) uprobe->refcount to SRCU
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Jul 08 2024 - 05:29:55 EST
With handle_swbp() hitting concurrently on (all) CPUs, potentially on
the same uprobe, the uprobe->refcount can get *very* hot. Move the
struct uprobe lifetime into uprobes_srcu such that it covers both the
uprobe and the uprobe->consumers list.
With this, handle_swbp() can use a single large SRCU critical section
to avoid taking a refcount on the uprobe for it's duration.
Notably, the single-step and uretprobe paths need a reference that
leaves handle_swbp() and will, for now, still use ->refcount.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ static void put_uprobe(struct uprobe *up
mutex_lock(&delayed_uprobe_lock);
delayed_uprobe_remove(uprobe, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&delayed_uprobe_lock);
- call_rcu(&uprobe->rcu, uprobe_free_rcu);
+ call_srcu(&uprobes_srcu, &uprobe->rcu, uprobe_free_rcu);
}
}
@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ static struct uprobe *__find_uprobe(stru
struct rb_node *node = rb_find_rcu(&key, &uprobes_tree, __uprobe_cmp_key);
if (node)
- return get_uprobe(__node_2_uprobe(node));
+ return __node_2_uprobe(node);
return NULL;
}
@@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ static struct uprobe *find_uprobe(struct
{
unsigned int seq;
- guard(rcu)();
+ lockdep_assert(srcu_read_lock_held(&uprobes_srcu));
do {
seq = read_seqcount_begin(&uprobes_seqcount);
@@ -1130,6 +1130,8 @@ void uprobe_unregister_nosync(struct ino
{
struct uprobe *uprobe;
+ guard(srcu)(&uprobes_srcu);
+
uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset);
if (WARN_ON(!uprobe))
return;
@@ -1137,7 +1139,6 @@ void uprobe_unregister_nosync(struct ino
mutex_lock(&uprobe->register_mutex);
__uprobe_unregister(uprobe, uc);
mutex_unlock(&uprobe->register_mutex);
- put_uprobe(uprobe);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_unregister_nosync);
@@ -1247,6 +1248,8 @@ int uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, lo
struct uprobe_consumer *con;
int ret = -ENOENT;
+ guard(srcu)(&uprobes_srcu);
+
uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset);
if (WARN_ON(!uprobe))
return ret;
@@ -1257,7 +1260,6 @@ int uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, lo
if (con)
ret = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, add ? uc : NULL);
mutex_unlock(&uprobe->register_mutex);
- put_uprobe(uprobe);
return ret;
}
@@ -1977,7 +1979,7 @@ pre_ssout(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct
return err;
}
- utask->active_uprobe = uprobe;
+ utask->active_uprobe = get_uprobe(uprobe);
utask->state = UTASK_SSTEP;
return 0;
}
@@ -2108,7 +2110,7 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe
int remove = UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE;
bool need_prep = false; /* prepare return uprobe, when needed */
- guard(srcu)(&uprobes_srcu);
+ lockdep_assert(srcu_read_lock_held(&uprobes_srcu));
for_each_consumer_rcu(uc, uprobe->consumers) {
int rc = 0;
@@ -2227,6 +2229,8 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *
if (bp_vaddr == get_trampoline_vaddr())
return handle_trampoline(regs);
+ guard(srcu)(&uprobes_srcu);
+
uprobe = find_active_uprobe(bp_vaddr, &is_swbp);
if (!uprobe) {
if (is_swbp > 0) {
@@ -2255,7 +2259,7 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *
* new and not-yet-analyzed uprobe at the same address, restart.
*/
if (unlikely(!test_bit(UPROBE_COPY_INSN, &uprobe->flags)))
- goto out;
+ return;
/*
* Pairs with the smp_wmb() in prepare_uprobe().
@@ -2268,22 +2272,17 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *
/* Tracing handlers use ->utask to communicate with fetch methods */
if (!get_utask())
- goto out;
+ return;
if (arch_uprobe_ignore(&uprobe->arch, regs))
- goto out;
+ return;
handler_chain(uprobe, regs);
if (arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(&uprobe->arch, regs))
- goto out;
-
- if (!pre_ssout(uprobe, regs, bp_vaddr))
return;
- /* arch_uprobe_skip_sstep() succeeded, or restart if can't singlestep */
-out:
- put_uprobe(uprobe);
+ pre_ssout(uprobe, regs, bp_vaddr);
}
/*