Re: [PATCH v2] rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()

From: Neeraj upadhyay
Date: Mon Jul 08 2024 - 09:39:15 EST

Next message: Matteo Martelli: "Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: add support for pac1921"
Previous message: Guillaume La Roque: "[PATCH] net: ti: icssg-prueth: add missing deps"
Next in thread: Z qiang: "Re: [PATCH v2] rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Zqiang,

On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 2:24 PM Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> For kernels built with CONFIG_FORCE_NR_CPUS=y, the nr_cpu_ids is
> defined as NR_CPUS instead of the number of possible cpus, this
> will cause the following system panic:
>
> [ 0.015349][ T0] smpboot: Allowing 4 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs
> ...
> [ 0.021342][ T0] setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:512 nr_cpumask_bits:512 nr_cpu_ids:512 nr_node_ids:1
> ...
> [ 3.681252][ T15] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff9911c8c8
> [ 3.689415][ T45] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: debug port 2
> [ 3.697008][ T15] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 3.697009][ T15] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ 3.706233][ T45] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: irq 16, io mem 0xf7e3c000
> [ 3.708152][ T15] PGD 40fa24067 P4D 40fa24067 PUD 40fa25063 PMD 410bff063
> [ 3.720380][ T45] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00
> [ 3.720430][ T15] PTE 800ffffbefee3062
> [ 3.720431][ T15] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> [ 3.727873][ T45] usb usb2: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0002, bcdDevice= 6.06
> [ 3.734009][ T15] CPU: 0 PID: 15 Comm: rcu_tasks_trace Tainted: G W 6.6.21 #1 5dc7acf91a5e8e9ac9dcfc35bee0245691283ea6
> [ 3.734011][ T15] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 9020/005T15, BIOS A14 09/14/2015
> [ 3.734012][ T15] RIP: 0010:rcu_tasks_need_gpcb+0x25d/0x2c0
> [ 3.737962][ T45] usb usb2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1
> [ 3.742877][ T15] RSP: 0018:ffffa371c00a3e60 EFLAGS: 00010082
> [ 3.751891][ T45] usb usb2: Product: EHCI Host Controller
> [ 3.764495][ T15]
> [ 3.764496][ T15] RAX: ffffffff98929ca0 RBX: ffffffff98b3b328 RCX: 0000000000021880
> [ 3.764497][ T15] RDX: ffffffff9911c880 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
> [ 3.772461][ T45] usb usb2: Manufacturer: Linux 6.6.21 ehci_hcd
> [ 3.778248][ T15] RBP: 0000000000000202 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> [ 3.778249][ T15] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000003
> [ 3.778249][ T15] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffffffff98b3b320
> [ 3.786216][ T45] usb usb2: SerialNumber: 0000:00:1a.0
> [ 3.805811][ T15] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8c781ea00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 3.805813][ T15] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 3.811993][ T45] hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found
> [ 3.817383][ T15] CR2: ffffffff9911c8c8 CR3: 000000040fa20005 CR4: 00000000001706f0
> [ 3.817385][ T15] Call Trace:
> [ 3.817386][ T15] <TASK>
> [ 3.817388][ T15] ? __die+0x23/0x80
> [ 3.819643][ T45] hub 2-0:1.0: 2 ports detected
> [ 3.827481][ T15] ? page_fault_oops+0xa4/0x180
> [ 3.827485][ T15] ? exc_page_fault+0x152/0x180
> [ 3.922376][ T15] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x40
> [ 3.927289][ T15] ? rcu_tasks_need_gpcb+0x25d/0x2c0
> [ 3.932459][ T15] ? __pfx_rcu_tasks_kthread+0x40/0x40
> [ 3.937806][ T15] rcu_tasks_one_gp+0x69/0x180
> [ 3.942451][ T15] rcu_tasks_kthread+0x94/0xc0
> [ 3.947096][ T15] kthread+0xe8/0x140
> [ 3.950956][ T15] ? __pfx_kthread+0x40/0x40
> [ 3.955425][ T15] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x80
> [ 3.959721][ T15] ? __pfx_kthread+0x40/0x40
> [ 3.964192][ T15] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x80
> [ 3.968841][ T15] </TASK>
>
> Consider that there may be holes in the CPU numbers, this commit
> use the maxcpu variable to store the CPU numbers after traversing
> possible cpu, and generate the rcu_task_cpu_ids variable and assign
> it to (maxcpu +1) instead of nr_cpu_ids.
>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/CALMA0xaTSMN+p4xUXkzrtR5r6k7hgoswcaXx7baR_z9r5jjskw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
> Reported-by: Zhixu Liu <zhixu.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> index e362f72bb65d..22310965acc7 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ struct rcu_tasks_percpu {
> struct list_head rtp_blkd_tasks;
> struct list_head rtp_exit_list;
> int cpu;
> + int index;
> struct rcu_tasks *rtpp;
> };
>
> @@ -110,6 +111,7 @@ struct rcu_tasks {
> call_rcu_func_t call_func;
> unsigned int wait_state;
> struct rcu_tasks_percpu __percpu *rtpcpu;
> + struct rcu_tasks_percpu **rtpcp_array;
> int percpu_enqueue_shift;
> int percpu_enqueue_lim;
> int percpu_dequeue_lim;
> @@ -182,6 +184,8 @@ module_param(rcu_task_collapse_lim, int, 0444);
> static int rcu_task_lazy_lim __read_mostly = 32;
> module_param(rcu_task_lazy_lim, int, 0444);
>
> +static int rcu_task_cpu_ids;
> +
> /* RCU tasks grace-period state for debugging. */
> #define RTGS_INIT 0
> #define RTGS_WAIT_WAIT_CBS 1
> @@ -245,6 +249,8 @@ static void cblist_init_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
> int cpu;
> int lim;
> int shift;
> + int maxcpu;
> + int index = 0;
>
> if (rcu_task_enqueue_lim < 0) {
> rcu_task_enqueue_lim = 1;
> @@ -254,14 +260,9 @@ static void cblist_init_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
> }
> lim = rcu_task_enqueue_lim;
>
> - if (lim > nr_cpu_ids)
> - lim = nr_cpu_ids;
> - shift = ilog2(nr_cpu_ids / lim);
> - if (((nr_cpu_ids - 1) >> shift) >= lim)
> - shift++;
> - WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, shift);
> - WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, lim);
> - smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, lim);
> + rtp->rtpcp_array = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(struct rcu_tasks_percpu *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + BUG_ON(!rtp->rtpcp_array);
> +
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpu);
>
> @@ -273,14 +274,29 @@ static void cblist_init_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
> INIT_WORK(&rtpcp->rtp_work, rcu_tasks_invoke_cbs_wq);
> rtpcp->cpu = cpu;
> rtpcp->rtpp = rtp;
> + rtpcp->index = index;
> + rtp->rtpcp_array[index] = rtpcp;
> + index++;
> if (!rtpcp->rtp_blkd_tasks.next)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rtpcp->rtp_blkd_tasks);
> if (!rtpcp->rtp_exit_list.next)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rtpcp->rtp_exit_list);
> + maxcpu = cpu;
> }
>
> - pr_info("%s: Setting shift to %d and lim to %d rcu_task_cb_adjust=%d.\n", rtp->name,
> - data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift), data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim), rcu_task_cb_adjust);
> + rcu_task_cpu_ids = maxcpu + 1;
> + if (lim > rcu_task_cpu_ids)
> + lim = rcu_task_cpu_ids;
> + shift = ilog2(rcu_task_cpu_ids / lim);
> + if (((rcu_task_cpu_ids - 1) >> shift) >= lim)
> + shift++;
> + WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, shift);
> + WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, lim);
> + smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, lim);
> +
> + pr_info("%s: Setting shift to %d and lim to %d rcu_task_cb_adjust=%d rcu_task_cpu_ids=%d.\n",
> + rtp->name, data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift), data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim),
> + rcu_task_cb_adjust, rcu_task_cpu_ids);
> }
>
> // Compute wakeup time for lazy callback timer.
> @@ -348,7 +364,7 @@ static void call_rcu_tasks_generic(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func,
> rtpcp->rtp_n_lock_retries = 0;
> }
> if (rcu_task_cb_adjust && ++rtpcp->rtp_n_lock_retries > rcu_task_contend_lim &&
> - READ_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim) != nr_cpu_ids)
> + READ_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim) != rcu_task_cpu_ids)
> needadjust = true; // Defer adjustment to avoid deadlock.
> }
> // Queuing callbacks before initialization not yet supported.
> @@ -368,10 +384,10 @@ static void call_rcu_tasks_generic(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func,
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
> if (unlikely(needadjust)) {
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtp->cbs_gbl_lock, flags);
> - if (rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim != nr_cpu_ids) {
> + if (rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim != rcu_task_cpu_ids) {
> WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, 0);
> - WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, nr_cpu_ids);
> - smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, nr_cpu_ids);
> + WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, rcu_task_cpu_ids);
> + smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, rcu_task_cpu_ids);
> pr_info("Switching %s to per-CPU callback queuing.\n", rtp->name);
> }
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtp->cbs_gbl_lock, flags);
> @@ -481,7 +497,7 @@ static int rcu_tasks_need_gpcb(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
> if (rcu_task_cb_adjust && ncbs <= rcu_task_collapse_lim) {
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtp->cbs_gbl_lock, flags);
> if (rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim > 1) {
> - WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, order_base_2(nr_cpu_ids));
> + WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, order_base_2(rcu_task_cpu_ids));
> smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, 1);
> rtp->percpu_dequeue_gpseq = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
> gpdone = false;
> @@ -496,7 +512,9 @@ static int rcu_tasks_need_gpcb(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
> pr_info("Completing switch %s to CPU-0 callback queuing.\n", rtp->name);
> }
> if (rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim == 1) {
> - for (cpu = rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
> + for (cpu = rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim; cpu < rcu_task_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
> + if (!cpu_possible(cpu))
> + continue;

Do we also need a `!cpu_possible(cpu)` check in `for (cpu = 0; cpu <
dequeue_limit; cpu++)`
loop in the same function rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()?

- Neeraj

> struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpu);
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rtpcp->cblist));
> @@ -511,30 +529,32 @@ static int rcu_tasks_need_gpcb(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
> // Advance callbacks and invoke any that are ready.
> static void rcu_tasks_invoke_cbs(struct rcu_tasks *rtp, struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp)
> {
> - int cpu;
> - int cpunext;
> int cpuwq;
> unsigned long flags;
> int len;
> + int index;
> struct rcu_head *rhp;
> struct rcu_cblist rcl = RCU_CBLIST_INITIALIZER(rcl);
> struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp_next;
>
> - cpu = rtpcp->cpu;
> - cpunext = cpu * 2 + 1;
> - if (cpunext < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
> - rtpcp_next = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpunext);
> - cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(cpunext) ? cpunext : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
> - queue_work_on(cpuwq, system_wq, &rtpcp_next->rtp_work);
> - cpunext++;
> - if (cpunext < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
> - rtpcp_next = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpunext);
> - cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(cpunext) ? cpunext : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
> + index = rtpcp->index * 2 + 1;
> + if (index < num_possible_cpus()) {
> + rtpcp_next = rtp->rtpcp_array[index];
> + if (rtpcp_next->cpu < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
> + cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(rtpcp_next->cpu) ? rtpcp_next->cpu : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
> queue_work_on(cpuwq, system_wq, &rtpcp_next->rtp_work);
> + index++;
> + if (index < num_possible_cpus()) {
> + rtpcp_next = rtp->rtpcp_array[index];
> + if (rtpcp_next->cpu < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
> + cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(rtpcp_next->cpu) ? rtpcp_next->cpu : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
> + queue_work_on(cpuwq, system_wq, &rtpcp_next->rtp_work);
> + }
> + }
> }
> }
>
> - if (rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist) || !cpu_possible(cpu))
> + if (rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist))
> return;
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
> rcu_segcblist_advance(&rtpcp->cblist, rcu_seq_current(&rtp->tasks_gp_seq));
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Next message: Matteo Martelli: "Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: add support for pac1921"
Previous message: Guillaume La Roque: "[PATCH] net: ti: icssg-prueth: add missing deps"
Next in thread: Z qiang: "Re: [PATCH v2] rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]