Re: [PATCH v9 10/13] PCI: Give pci_intx() its own devres callback

[Philipp Stanner]

@Bjorn, @Krzysztof

On Mon, 2024-07-08 at 21:46 +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> With this patch applied, we are observing unloading and then
> reloading issues with the AMD Crypto (CCP) driver:

Thank you very much for digging into this, Ashish

Could you give me some pointers how one could test CCP by himself?

> 
> with DEVRES logging enabled, we observe the following logs:
> 
> [  218.093588] ccp 0000:a2:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000c18c52fb
> 0xffff8d09dc1972c0 devm_kzalloc_release (152 bytes)
> [  218.105527] ccp 0000:a2:00.1: DEVRES REL 000000003091fb95
> 0xffff8d09d3aad000 devm_kzalloc_release (3072 bytes)
> [  218.117500] ccp 0000:a2:00.1: DEVRES REL 0000000049e4adfe
> 0xffff8d09d588f000 pcim_intx_restore (4 bytes)
> [  218.129519] ccp 0000:a2:00.1: DEVRES ADD 000000001a2ac6ad
> 0xffff8cfa867b7cc0 pcim_intx_restore (4 bytes)
> [  218.140434] ccp 0000:a2:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000627ecaf7
> 0xffff8d09d588f680 pcim_msi_release (16 bytes)
> [  218.151665] ccp 0000:a2:00.1: DEVRES REL 0000000058b2252a
> 0xffff8d09dc199680 msi_device_data_release (80 bytes)
> [  218.163625] ccp 0000:a2:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000435cc85e
> 0xffff8d09d588ff80 devm_attr_group_remove (8 bytes)
> [  218.175224] ccp 0000:a2:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000cb6fcd9b
> 0xffff8d09eb583660 pcim_addr_resource_release (40 bytes)
> [  218.187319] ccp 0000:a2:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000d64a8b84
> 0xffff8d09eb583180 pcim_iomap_release (48 bytes)
> [  218.198615] ccp 0000:a2:00.1: DEVRES REL 0000000099ac6b28
> 0xffff8d09eb5830c0 pcim_addr_resource_release (40 bytes)
> [  218.210730] ccp 0000:a2:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000bdd27f88
> 0xffff8d09d3ac2700 pcim_release (0 bytes)
> [  218.221489] ccp 0000:a2:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000e763315c
> 0xffff8d09d3ac2240 devm_kzalloc_release (20 bytes)
> [  218.233008] ccp 0000:a2:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000ae90f983
> 0xffff8d09dc25a800 devm_kzalloc_release (184 bytes)
> [  218.245251] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000a2ec0085
> 0xffff8cfa86bee700 fw_name_devm_release (16 bytes)
> [  218.256748] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 0000000021bccd98
> 0xffff8cfaa528d5c0 devm_pages_release (16 bytes)
> [  218.268044] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 000000003ef7cbc7
> 0xffff8cfaa1b5ec00 devm_kzalloc_release (104 bytes)
> [  218.279631] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000619322e1
> 0xffff8cfaa1b5e480 devm_kzalloc_release (152 bytes)
> [  218.300438] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000c261523b
> 0xffff8cfaad88b000 devm_kzalloc_release (3072 bytes)
> [  218.331000] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000fbd19618
> 0xffff8cfaa528d140 pcim_intx_restore (4 bytes)
> [  218.361330] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES ADD 0000000057f8e767
> 0xffff8cfa867b7740 pcim_intx_restore (4 bytes)
> [  218.391226] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 0000000058c9dce1
> 0xffff8cfaa528d880 pcim_msi_release (16 bytes)
> [  218.421340] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000c8ab08a7
> 0xffff8cfa9e617300 msi_device_data_release (80 bytes)
> [  218.452357] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000cf5baccb
> 0xffff8cfaa528d8c0 devm_attr_group_remove (8 bytes)
> [  218.483011] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000b8cbbadd
> 0xffff8cfa9c596060 pcim_addr_resource_release (40 bytes)
> [  218.514343] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000920f9607
> 0xffff8cfa9c596c60 pcim_iomap_release (48 bytes)
> [  218.544659] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000d401a708
> 0xffff8cfa9c596840 pcim_addr_resource_release (40 bytes)
> [  218.575774] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000865d2fa2
> 0xffff8cfaa528d940 pcim_release (0 bytes)
> [  218.605758] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000f5b79222
> 0xffff8cfaa528d080 devm_kzalloc_release (20 bytes)
> [  218.636260] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 0000000037ef240a
> 0xffff8cfa9eeb3f00 devm_kzalloc_release (184 bytes)
> 
> and the CCP driver reload issue during driver probe:
> 
> [  226.552684] pci 0000:23:00.1: Resources present before probing
> [  226.568846] pci 0000:a2:00.1: Resources present before probing
> 
> From the above DEVRES logging, it looks like pcim_intx_restore
> associated resource is being released but then
> being re-added during detach/unload, which causes really_probe() to
> fail at probe time, as dev->devres_head is
> not empty due to this added resource:
> ...
> [  218.331000] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000fbd19618
> 0xffff8cfaa528d140 pcim_intx_restore (4 bytes)
> [  218.361330] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES ADD 0000000057f8e767
> 0xffff8cfa867b7740 pcim_intx_restore (4 bytes)
> ...
> 
> Going more deep into this: 
> 
> This is the initial pcim_intx_resoure associated resource being added
> during first (CCP) driver load:
> 
> [   40.418933]  pcim_intx+0x3a/0x120
> [   40.418936]  pci_intx+0x8b/0xa0
> [   40.418939]  __pci_enable_msix_range+0x369/0x530
> [   40.418943]  pci_enable_msix_range+0x18/0x20
> [   40.418946]  sp_pci_probe+0x106/0x310 [ccp]
> [   40.418965] ipmi device interface
> [   40.418960]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> [   40.418969]  local_pci_probe+0x4f/0xb0
> [   40.418973]  work_for_cpu_fn+0x1e/0x30
> [   40.418976]  process_one_work+0x183/0x350
> [   40.418980]  worker_thread+0x2df/0x3f0
> [   40.418982]  ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> [   40.418985]  kthread+0xd0/0x100
> [   40.418987]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [   40.418990]  ret_from_fork+0x40/0x60
> [   40.418993]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [   40.418996]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> [   40.419001]  </TASK>
> ..
> ..
> [   40.419012] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES ADD 00000000fbd19618
> 0xffff8cfaa528d140 pcim_intx_restore (4 bytes)
> 
> Now, at driver unload: 
> devres_release_all() -> remove_nodes() -> release_nodes() ...
> 
> remove_nodes() moves normal devres entries to the todo list, as can
> be seen with the following log:
> ...
> [  218.245241] moving node 00000000fbd19618 0xffff8cfaa528d140 from
> devres to todo list
> ...
> 
> So, now this pcim_intx_resource associated resource is no longer part
> of dev->devres_head list and has been
> moved to the todo list.
> 
> Later, when release_nodes() is invoked, it calls the associated
> release() callback associated with this devres:
> ...
> [  218.331000] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES REL 00000000fbd19618
> 0xffff8cfaa528d140 pcim_intx_restore (4 bytes)
> ...
> 
> The call flow for that is:
> pcim_intx_restore() -> pci_intx() -> pcim_intx() ...
> 
> Now, pcim_intx() calls get_or_create_intx_devres() which tries to
> find it's associated devres using devres_find(), but 
> that fails to find the devres, as the devres is no longer on dev-
> >devres_head and has been moved to todo list.
> 
> Therefore, get_or_create_intx_devres() adds a new devres at driver
> unload/detach time:
> ...
> [  218.361330] ccp 0000:23:00.1: DEVRES ADD 0000000057f8e767
> 0xffff8cfa867b7740 pcim_intx_restore (4 bytes)
> ...

You're absolutely right, that seems to be the issue precisely. In fact,
this problem of PCI hybrid functions calling themselves again even
forced me to implement a "pure unmanaged" version of
__pci_request_region(). So it's a pity that I didn't think of that
problem for pci_intx().

> 
> But, then this is an issue as pcim_intx() is supposed to restore the
> original PCI INTx state on driver detach, but it now
> operating on a newly added devres and not the original devres (added
> at driver probe) which contains the original PCI INTx
> state, so it will be restoring an incorrect PCI INTx state ?

I think this is just UB and we don't have to think about whether it's
the correct state or not – it must only be restored once, so it's
broken in any case.

> 
> Additionally, this newly added devres causes driver reload/probe
> failure as really_probe() now finds resources present
> before probing.

Yes, that has to be separated.

@Bjorn:
So I think the solution will be not to call into pci_intx() from
pcim_intx_restore() at all anymore.

Similar as we do with __pci_request_region() <-> __pcim_request_region().

Let me dig into that..

I guess you'll prefer me to send a fixup commit to squash into the
pcim_intx() commit?

I'm quite busy today, but will definitely deliver that quite soon.

> 
> Not sure, if this issue has been observed with other PCI device
> drivers.

Everyone using pci_intx() AND pcim_enable_device() will have this
issue.

The only thing I'm wondering about is where your code in
drivers/crypto/ccp/ calls into pci_intx()?


Regards,
P.

> 
> Thanks,
> Ashish
>