On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 05:55:04PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
When developing hardware watchpoint on LoongArch, we want to set the
same privilege passed by the ptrace user data, but there is no bridge
to save this value like bp_addr, bp_type and bp_len. This is a common
issue for the archs which have privilege level of breakpoint.
Add a member "bp_priv" which lives in a union on config3 at the end
of the uapi struct perf_event_attr to make a bridge between ptrace
and hardware breakpoint.
This is preparation for later patch on some archs such as ARM, ARM64
and LoongArch which have privilege level of breakpoint.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 5 ++++-
kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index 3a64499b0f5d..abe8da7a1f60 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -521,7 +521,10 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
*/
__u64 sig_data;
- __u64 config3; /* extension of config2 */
+ union {
+ __u8 bp_priv; /* privilege level of breakpoint */
+ __u64 config3; /* extension of config2 */
+ };
};
/*
diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
index 6c2cb4e4f48d..3ad16b226e4f 100644
--- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -754,6 +754,7 @@ static void hw_breakpoint_copy_attr(struct perf_event_attr *to,
to->bp_addr = from->bp_addr;
to->bp_type = from->bp_type;
to->bp_len = from->bp_len;
+ to->bp_priv = from->bp_priv;
to->disabled = from->disabled;
}
Sorry, but I still don't see why we should change uapi for this. As I
have said multiple times, this is unnecessary.