Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the asm-generic tree

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 13:53, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 01:44:34PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> Though I'm still not sure what uretprobe is only added
>> to half the architectures at the moment. There is a chance
>> we need a different conditional for it than '64'.
>
> uretprobe is defined only for x86_64, not sure what that means
> for scripts/syscall.tbl though

I meant you hooked it up unconditionally for all architectures
using the old method, i.e. arc, arm64, csky, hexagon, loongarch64,
nios2, openrisc, riscv32, riscv64, and xtensa in addition
to x86-64, but not for the other ABIs: alpha, arm32, m68k,
microblaze, mips-o32, mips-n32, mips64, nios2, parisc32, parisc64,
powerpc32, powerpc64, powerpc-spu, s390-31, s390-64, sh,
sparc32, sparc64, x86-32 and x86-x32.

If that is not the list you had intended, do you have a list
of which architectures actually have the required hardware
to hook it up? It would be good to do this correctly from
the start so we don't rely on architecture maintainers assigning
the numbers individually.

     ARnd