Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource: sp804: Make user selectable

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 08/07/2024 19:44, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 06:49:38PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 29/05/2024 21:48, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > The sp804 is currently only user selectable if COMPILE_TEST, this was
> > > done by commit dfc82faad725 ("clocksource/drivers/sp804: Add
> > > COMPILE_TEST to CONFIG_ARM_TIMER_SP804") in order to avoid it being
> > > spuriously offered on platforms that won't have the hardware since it's
> > > generally only seen on Arm based platforms.  This config is overly
> > > restrictive, while platforms that rely on the SP804 do select it in
> > > their Kconfig there are others such as the Arm fast models which have a
> > > SP804 available but currently unused by Linux.  Relax the dependency to
> > > allow it to be user selectable on arm and arm64 to avoid surprises and
> > > in case someone comes up with a use for extra timer hardware.
>
> > Would it make sense to add the option in the platform so it selects the
> > timer ?
>
> As the commit log says far as I'm aware all the platforms that rely on
> the sp804 timer already select it (they wouldn't otherwise be able to
> work unless COMPILE_TEST was enabled).  The Arm models and possibly
> other platforms have the sp804 but it will currently be ignored by Linux
> and the architected timers used instead so it would be wasteful to force
> it on for them.

The policy of the Kconfig is we should keep the option silent.

My suggestion was to provide the option in the platforms Kconfig and 
[un]select the ARM_TIMER_SP804 from there


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog