Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:15:59 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> /tmp/next/build/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_struct_ops.c:280:16: error: initialization of 'int (*)(void *, struct bpf_link *)' from incompatible pointer type 'int (*)(void *)' [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>   280 |         .reg = hid_bpf_reg,
>       |                ^~~~~~~~~~~
> /tmp/next/build/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_struct_ops.c:280:16: note: (near initialization for 'bpf_hid_bpf_ops.reg')
> /tmp/next/build/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_struct_ops.c:281:18: error: initialization of 'void (*)(void *, struct bpf_link *)' from incompatible pointer type 'void (*)(void *)' [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>   281 |         .unreg = hid_bpf_unreg,
>       |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /tmp/next/build/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_struct_ops.c:281:18: note: (near initialization for 'bpf_hid_bpf_ops.unreg')
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   73287fe228721b ("bpf: pass bpf_struct_ops_link to callbacks in bpf_struct_ops.")
> 
> interacting with commit
> 
>   ebc0d8093e8c97 ("HID: bpf: implement HID-BPF through bpf_struct_ops")
> 
> from the HID tree.
> 
> I've fixed it up as below:
> 
> From e8aeaba00440845f9bd8d6183ca5d7383a678cd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:02:27 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] HID: bpf: Fix up build
> 
> Fix up build error due to 73287fe228721b ("bpf: pass bpf_struct_ops_link to callbacks in bpf_struct_ops.")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_struct_ops.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_struct_ops.c b/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_struct_ops.c
> index 5f200557ff12b..744318e7d936b 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_struct_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_struct_ops.c
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int hid_bpf_ops_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int hid_bpf_reg(void *kdata)
> +static int hid_bpf_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
>  {
>  	struct hid_bpf_ops *ops = kdata;
>  	struct hid_device *hdev;
> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int hid_bpf_reg(void *kdata)
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> -static void hid_bpf_unreg(void *kdata)
> +static void hid_bpf_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
>  {
>  	struct hid_bpf_ops *ops = kdata;
>  	struct hid_device *hdev;
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

This fixup is now required when the hid and next-next trees are merged.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgp1azNemIgpH.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature