Re: 6.10/regression/bisected - after f1d97e769152 I spotted increased execution time of the kswapd0 process and symptoms as if there is not enough memory

[Mikhail Gavrilov]

On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 7:16 PM Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That's weird, I think you might be observing some variance.
> I noticed that too for your reports of the test2 branch and the old
> test3 branch, which were very identical, yet you got a very
> significant difference between them.
>
> Thanks.
>

up  1:00
root         269 10.2  0.0      0     0 ?        S    10:06   6:13 [kswapd0]
up  2:01
root         269  9.1  0.0      0     0 ?        S    10:06  11:07 [kswapd0]
up  3:00
root         269  8.4  0.0      0     0 ?        R    10:06  15:18 [kswapd0]
up  4:21
root         269 11.7  0.0      0     0 ?        S    10:06  30:33 [kswapd0]
up  5:01
root         269 11.7  0.0      0     0 ?        S    10:06  35:19 [kswapd0]
up  6:27
root         269 11.5  0.0      0     0 ?        S    10:06  44:39 [kswapd0]
up  7:00
root         269 11.2  0.0      0     0 ?        R    10:06  47:18 [kswapd0]

The measurement error can reach ±10 min.
Did you plan to merge the fix before the 6.10 release?

-- 
Best Regards,
Mike Gavrilov.