[syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in do_ipv6_setsockopt (4)

From: syzbot
Date: Wed Jul 10 2024 - 12:04:46 EST

Next message: Steven Price: "Re: [PATCH v4 08/15] arm64: mm: Avoid TLBI when marking pages as valid"
Previous message: syzbot: "[syzbot] [wpan?] WARNING in __dev_change_net_namespace (2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: 2f5e6395714d Merge branch 'net-pse-pd-add-new-pse-c33-feat..
git tree: net-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16f7e781980000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=db697e01efa9d1d7
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3433b5cb8b2b70933f8d
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/44296878e8d6/disk-2f5e6395.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a3f8523e4843/vmlinux-2f5e6395.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c40a60a2869f/bzImage-2f5e6395.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+3433b5cb8b2b70933f8d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.10.0-rc6-syzkaller-01258-g2f5e6395714d #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.4.1060/8537 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8f5e7f48 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_ipv6_setsockopt+0x9e4/0x3630 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:566

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88807b8c0a50 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_setsockopt+0x1c3/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3064

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
smc_switch_to_fallback+0x35/0xd00 net/smc/af_smc.c:902
smc_sendmsg+0x11f/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:2779
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:745
__sys_sendto+0x3a4/0x4f0 net/socket.c:2192
__do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2204 [inline]
__se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2200 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendto+0xde/0x100 net/socket.c:2200
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #1 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
lock_sock_nested+0x48/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3543
do_ip_setsockopt+0x1a2d/0x3cd0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1078
ip_setsockopt+0x63/0x100 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1417
do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2312
__sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2335
__do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2344 [inline]
__se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2341 [inline]
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2341
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
do_ipv6_setsockopt+0x9e4/0x3630 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:566
ipv6_setsockopt+0x5c/0x1a0 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:993
smc_setsockopt+0x275/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3072
do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2312
__sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2335
__do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2344 [inline]
__se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2341 [inline]
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2341
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
rtnl_mutex --> sk_lock-AF_INET --> &smc->clcsock_release_lock

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
lock(rtnl_mutex);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz.4.1060/8537:
#0: ffff88807b8c0a50 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_setsockopt+0x1c3/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3064

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 8537 Comm: syz.4.1060 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc6-syzkaller-01258-g2f5e6395714d #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/07/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
do_ipv6_setsockopt+0x9e4/0x3630 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:566
ipv6_setsockopt+0x5c/0x1a0 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:993
smc_setsockopt+0x275/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3072
do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2312
__sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2335
__do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2344 [inline]
__se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2341 [inline]
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2341
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f0383b75bd9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f0384934048 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f0383d03f60 RCX: 00007f0383b75bd9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000029 RDI: 0000000000000007
RBP: 00007f0383be4aa1 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f0383d03f60 R15: 00007ffd8c5ba008
</TASK>

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

Next message: Steven Price: "Re: [PATCH v4 08/15] arm64: mm: Avoid TLBI when marking pages as valid"
Previous message: syzbot: "[syzbot] [wpan?] WARNING in __dev_change_net_namespace (2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]