Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Address translation for HDM decoding

From: Alison Schofield
Date: Wed Jul 10 2024 - 20:02:55 EST


On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 07:47:48PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> Default expectation of Linux is that HPA == SPA, which means that
> hardware addresses in the decoders are the same as the kernel sees
> them. However, there are platforms where this is not the case and an
> address translation between decoder's (HPA) and the system's physical
> addresses (SPA) is needed.
>
> This series implements address translation for HDM decoding. The
> implementation follows the rule that the representation of hardware
> address ranges in the kernel are all SPA. If decoder registers (HDM
> decoder cap or register range) are not SPA, a base offset must be
> applied. Translation happens when accessing the registers back and
> forth. After a read access an address will be converted to SPA and
> before a write access the programmed address is translated from an
> SPA. The decoder register access can be easily encapsulated by address
> translation and thus there are only a few places where translation is
> needed and the code must be changed. This is implemented in patch #2,
> patch #1 is a prerequisite.
>
> Address translation is restricted to platforms that need it. As such a
> platform check is needed and a flag is introduced for this (patch #3).
>
> For address translation the base offset must be determined for the
> memory domain. Depending on the platform there are various options for
> this. The address range in the CEDT's CFWMS entry of the CXL host
> bridge can be used to determine the decoder's base address (patch
> #4). This is enabled for AMD Zen4 platforms (patch #5).


Hi Robert,

This HPA->SPA work needs to be done for addresses reported directly by
devices, ie DPAs in poison and other events - right?

For the XOR case, we discover the need for HPA->SPA while parsing the
CFMWS and add a cxl_hpa_to_spa_fn to the struct cxl_root_decoder. Later,
when the driver wants to translate a DPA (to include in a TRACE_EVENT)
it uses that 'extra mile' HPA->SPA function.

See Patch 2 in this series:
https://lore.kernel.org/cover.1719980933.git.alison.schofield@xxxxxxxxx/T/#m9206e1f872ef252dbb54ce7f0365f0b267179fda

It seems the Zen4 extra mile is a simple offset from the base calc.
Do you think a zen4 hpa->spa function will fit in with what I've done?

FWIW I took this code for a spin through cxl-test on it's own and combined
w the xor address tranlation patch set and no collisions, all humming along
nicely (for non-zen config).

--Alison

>
snip
>