Re: [PATCH V4 8/8] cpufreq: Add Rust based cpufreq-dt driver

[Danilo Krummrich]

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 12:27:50PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This commit adds a Rust based cpufreq-dt driver, which covers most of
> the functionality of the existing C based driver. Only a handful of
> things are left, like fetching platform data from cpufreq-dt-platdev.c.
> 
> This is tested with the help of QEMU for now and switching of
> frequencies work as expected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig        |  12 ++
>  drivers/cpufreq/Makefile       |   1 +
>  drivers/cpufreq/rcpufreq_dt.rs | 222 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 235 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/rcpufreq_dt.rs
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/rcpufreq_dt.rs b/drivers/cpufreq/rcpufreq_dt.rs
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3e86ad134e13
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/rcpufreq_dt.rs
> +
> +impl platform::Driver for CPUFreqDTDriver {
> +    type Data = ();
> +
> +    define_of_id_table! {(), [
> +        (of::DeviceId(b_str!("operating-points-v2")), None),
> +    ]}
> +
> +    fn probe(dev: &mut platform::Device, _id_info: Option<&Self::IdInfo>) -> Result<Self::Data> {
> +        let drv = cpufreq::Registration::<CPUFreqDTDriver>::register(

Please just call this function `cpufreq::Registration::new`.

The existance of a `cpufreq::Registration` means that it's registered. Once it
is dropped, it's unregistered. It's the whole point of a `Registration` type
to bind the period of a driver being registered to the lifetime of a
`Registration` instance.

Having `Registration::register` implies a bit, that we could ever have an
unregistered `Registration`, which can never happen.

Besides that, it'd be nice to follow the same naming scheme everywhere.

> +            c_str!("cpufreq-dt"),
> +            (),
> +            cpufreq::flags::NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK | cpufreq::flags::IS_COOLING_DEV,
> +            true,
> +        )?;
> +
> +        Devres::new_foreign_owned(dev.as_ref(), drv, GFP_KERNEL)?;

This should be called by `cpufreq::Registration` directly, otherwise it's every
driver's responsibility to take care of the registration lifetime.

> +
> +        pr_info!("CPUFreq DT driver registered\n");
> +
> +        Ok(())
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +module_platform_driver! {
> +    type: CPUFreqDTDriver,
> +    name: "cpufreq_dt",
> +    author: "Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>",
> +    description: "Generic CPUFreq DT driver",
> +    license: "GPL v2",
> +}
> -- 
> 2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514
>