RE: [PATCH v3 04/11] i2c: riic: Enable runtime PM autosuspend support

[Biju Das]

Hi Claudiu,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2024 8:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] i2c: riic: Enable runtime PM autosuspend support
> 
> Hi, Biju,
> 
> On 12.07.2024 10:15, Biju Das wrote:
> > Hi Claudiu,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2024 12:52 PM
> >> Subject: [PATCH v3 04/11] i2c: riic: Enable runtime PM autosuspend
> >> support
> >>
> >> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Enable runtime PM autosuspend support for the RIIC driver. With this,
> >> in case there are consecutive xfer requests the device wouldn't be
> >> runtime enabled/disabled after each consecutive xfer but after the
> >> the delay configured by user. With this, we can avoid touching
> >> hardware registers involved in runtime PM suspend/resume saving in this way some cycles. The
> default chosen autosuspend delay is zero to keep the previous driver behavior.
> >
> > On the other hand, you are saving power. Currently the driver is
> > highly optimized for Power usage.
> >
> > Before transfer turn on the clock
> > After transfer turn off the clock, this is the optimal power usage correspond to suspend delay.
> >
> > By adding suspend delay, you are consuming power corresponding to that
> > delay.
> 
> The default delay is zero, see the following diff in this patch:
> 
> @@ -479,6 +481,8 @@ static int riic_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 
>  	i2c_parse_fw_timings(dev, &i2c_t, true);
> 
> +	pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(dev, 0);

I just provided justification, why you addes 0  msec here, compared to xx msec
in the original internal version.

Cheers,
Biju