Re: [PATCH] kselftest/alsa: Use card name rather than number in test names

[Takashi Iwai]

On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 18:19:25 +0200,
Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 06:08:38PM +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> > On 11. 07. 24 16:33, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > Address this by replacing our use of card numbers with card names which are
> > > more likely to be stable across runs. We use the long name since in the
> 
> > I think that a combination of card number and card ID may be sufficient (and
> > a compromise). It's shorter and user-friendly. Additionally, a table may be
> > printed at the beginning of report with card number, card ID and long card
> > name for further processing and identification.
> 
> These don't help, the problem is that anything which includes the card
> number in the test name result is going to result in unstable test names
> depending on race conditions at boot.  There are automated systems that
> parse kselftest output generically, I'm not sure there's a great deal of
> enthusiasm for writing a custom parser for the ALSA selftests
> specifically.

OTOH, longname can be really ugly to read, and it can vary because it
often embeds address or irq numbers in the string.

If a general name is the goal, how about using shortname instead?

Or use id field, as Jaroslav suggested, but without the card number
suffix; then it's unique among multiple cards.


thanks,

Takashi