Re: [PATCH V2 0/7] vdpa live update

From: Jason Wang
Date: Sun Jul 14 2024 - 22:14:59 EST


On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 9:19 PM Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Live update is a technique wherein an application saves its state, exec's
> to an updated version of itself, and restores its state. Clients of the
> application experience a brief suspension of service, on the order of
> 100's of milliseconds, but are otherwise unaffected.
>
> Define and implement interfaces that allow vdpa devices to be preserved
> across fork or exec, to support live update for applications such as QEMU.
> The device must be suspended during the update, but its DMA mappings are
> preserved, so the suspension is brief.
>
> The VHOST_NEW_OWNER ioctl transfers device ownership and pinned memory
> accounting from one process to another.
>
> The VHOST_BACKEND_F_NEW_OWNER backend capability indicates that
> VHOST_NEW_OWNER is supported.
>
> The VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP message type updates a DMA mapping with its userland
> address in the new process.
>
> The VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_REMAP backend capability indicates that
> VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP is supported and required. Some devices do not
> require it, because the userland address of each DMA mapping is discarded
> after being translated to a physical address.
>
> Here is a pseudo-code sequence for performing live update, based on
> suspend + reset because resume is not yet widely available. The vdpa device
> descriptor, fd, remains open across the exec.
>
> ioctl(fd, VHOST_VDPA_SUSPEND)
> ioctl(fd, VHOST_VDPA_SET_STATUS, 0)

I don't understand why we need a reset after suspend, it looks to me
the previous suspend became meaningless.

> exec
>
> ioctl(fd, VHOST_NEW_OWNER)
>
> issue ioctls to re-create vrings
>
> if VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_REMAP

So the idea is for a device that is using a virtual address, it
doesn't need VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_REMAP at all?

> foreach dma mapping
> write(fd, {VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP, new_addr})
>
> ioctl(fd, VHOST_VDPA_SET_STATUS,
> ACKNOWLEDGE | DRIVER | FEATURES_OK | DRIVER_OK)

>From API level, this seems to be asymmetric as we have suspending but
not resuming?

>
> This is faster than VHOST_RESET_OWNER + VHOST_SET_OWNER + VHOST_IOTLB_UPDATE,
> as that would would unpin and repin physical pages, which would cost multiple
> seconds for large memories.
>
> This is implemented in QEMU by the patch series "Live update: vdpa"
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/TBD (reference to be posted shortly)
>
> The QEMU implementation leverages the live migration code path, but after
> CPR exec's new QEMU:
> - vhost_vdpa_set_owner() calls VHOST_NEW_OWNER instead of VHOST_SET_OWNER
> - vhost_vdpa_dma_map() sets type VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP instead of
> VHOST_IOTLB_UPDATE
>
> Changes in V2:
> - clean up handling of set_map vs dma_map vs platform iommu in remap
> - augment and clarify commit messages and comments
>
> Steve Sistare (7):
> vhost-vdpa: count pinned memory
> vhost-vdpa: pass mm to bind
> vhost-vdpa: VHOST_NEW_OWNER
> vhost-vdpa: VHOST_BACKEND_F_NEW_OWNER
> vhost-vdpa: VHOST_IOTLB_REMAP
> vhost-vdpa: VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_REMAP
> vdpa/mlx5: new owner capability
>
> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 3 +-
> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 15 ++++
> drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/vhost.h | 10 +++
> include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h | 15 +++-
> 6 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.39.3
>

Thanks