Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: HID: i2c-hid: elan: Introduce Elan ekth6a12nay

[Conor Dooley]

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 07:22:30AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 12:32 AM Zhaoxiong Lv
> <lvzhaoxiong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The Elan ekth6a12nay touch screen chip same as Elan eKTH6915 controller
> > has a reset gpio. The difference is that they have different
> > post_power_delay_ms.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhaoxiong Lv <lvzhaoxiong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> FWIW things have changed enough between V1 and V2 that you probably
> should have removed Conor's "Acked-by" tag here and waited for him to
> re-add it.

Yeah, good spot. I wouldn't have acked this version would asking
questions - in v1 it made sense not to have a fallback when "they have a
different post power delay ms", but now there is a fallback. Is the
fallback actually suitable here, or might it be a naive rebase? Does the
ekth6a12nay work with the ekth6915's reset timing?

Thanks,
Conor.

> 
> I'd also note that when posting a patch your Signed-off-by should
> always be at the bottom of any collected tags. For reference [1].
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/tools/20221031165842.vxr4kp6h7qnkc53l@meerkat.local/
> 
> That being said, the new binding seems OK to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature