Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.11-rc1

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 09:00:55AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2024-07-14 09:44:55+0000, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 10:09:13AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > On 2024-07-12 20:16:13+0000, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:06:39AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 01:04:08PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Paul,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The following changes since commit f2661062f16b2de5d7b6a5c42a9a5c96326b8454:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >   Linux 6.10-rc5 (2024-06-23 17:08:54 -0400)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git tags/nolibc-20240629-for-6.11-1
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >   selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc (2024-06-29 09:44:58 +0200)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hearing no objections, I have pulled this in so that it will appear
> > > > > in the next -next.  Here are the test results:
> > > > > 
> > > > > make run:
> > > > > 195 test(s): 195 passed,   0 skipped,   0 failed => status: success
> > > > > 
> > > > > make run-user:
> > > > > 195 test(s): 193 passed,   2 skipped,   0 failed => status: warning
> > > > > 
> > > > > So looks good to me!
> > > 
> > > For testing you can use "./run-tests.sh -m [user | system]" to run the
> > > tests on all supported architectures via QEMU.
> > > 
> > > (On the first run you can use "-p" to download the toolchains)
> > 
> > Thank you for the info!
> > 
> > My near-term plan is that I do a smoke test on x86 (or whatever I am
> > running), and let you guys cover the various architectures.  Longer
> > term, I might get more into cross-architecture work.
> 
> I'll try to remember to add the full testreport for future
> pullrequests, too.
> 
> > > > And please see below for my proposed signed tag.  Please let me know of
> > > > any needed adjustments.
> > > > 
> > > > 							Thanx, Paul
> > > > 
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > 
> > > > tag nolibc.2024.07.12a
> > > > Tagger: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Date:   Fri Jul 12 16:56:21 2024 -0700
> > > > 
> > > > nolibc updates for v6.11
> > > > 
> > > > o	Fix selftest printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq()
> > > 
> > > Period at the end.
> > 
> > Good eyes, thank you, fixed.
> > 
> > > > o	Stop using brk() and sbrk() when testing against musl, which
> > > > 	implements these two functions with ENOMEM.
> > > > 
> > > > o	Make tests us -Werror to force failure on compiler warnings.
> > > > 
> > > > o	Add limits for the {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong types.
> > > > 
> > > > o	Implement strtol() and friends.
> > > > 
> > > > o	Add facility to skip nolibc-specific tests when running against
> > > > 	non-nolibc libraries.
> > > > 
> > > > o	Implement strerror().
> > > > 
> > > > o	Use strerror() unconditionally, instead of only when running
> > > > 	against non-nolibc libraries.
> > > 
> > > Maybe mention that this is about kselftest and not nolibc itself.
> > > 
> > > Otherwise looks good, thanks!
> > 
> > Thank you for looking this over, and does the updated version below
> > cover this?  If I am still off, please suggest updates.
> > 
> > 						Thanx, Paul
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > tag nolibc.2024.07.14a
> > Tagger: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Sun Jul 14 09:07:29 2024 -0700
> > 
> > nolibc updates for v6.11
> > 
> > o	Fix selftest printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq().
> > 
> > o	Stop using brk() and sbrk() when testing against musl, which
> > 	implements these two functions with ENOMEM.
> > 
> > o	Make tests use -Werror to force failure on compiler warnings.
> > 
> > o	Add limits for the {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong types.
> > 
> > o	Implement strtol() and friends.
> > 
> > o	Add facility to skip nolibc-specific tests when running against
> > 	non-nolibc libraries.
> > 
> > o	Implement strerror().
> > 
> > o	Use strerror() unconditionally, instead of only when running
> > 	kselftest.
> 
> "Also use strerror() on nolibc when running kselftests."

Very good, substituted your description for mine, thank you!

						Thanx, Paul

> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > 
> > iQJHBAABCgAxFiEEbK7UrM+RBIrCoViJnr8S83LZ+4wFAmaT98oTHHBhdWxtY2tA
> > a2VybmVsLm9yZwAKCRCevxLzctn7jHc0D/9chhJo+QQ+2V+xQEKT8n1MKiJaf55X
> > EUhIlKHoejrF7rZukqv1tcqMNP0wGzwKyttbFkX+72OHrxSuNr0MbvBjQi6cFcFo
> > 2QNg/ZEVIZKeMJzRXwUOOrg47hwLoGgFrt5cgSCMeYSm0E25oAx752/WbmQgQBlU
> > 2dOTomrxF7pyDQoJwPU3CNAk/fFZHuBX9Hjp0LPaXmKDq9BLWqUWoJZAOAfcxm2Q
> > F8A/HnOTEp5F5qwJLr0GStNxR44xH/GU/3KEdryzllEFj6PTLDAeP4oNdMK30q9F
> > YGrcpON3hjw1+XKQBTLJ/UIqQ3EeA/bo2yDOLsFZObU7aKrb7ewtxTq/DWUfoj4x
> > jfFCOc6JpsmAAlwm2zXn+MLDLxSF3QhTalpl1o4thrNgxhm/Eou+uz/1k2EREp/r
> > 4PfHC+i0YjGA9sJ12u1hUoPkxHXY0GKx+gHL9uwB5C2je7HyStzBRvDWEjUJw+uI
> > Z9+RkvSQFV82tIvczGzGuLkMM1of+M+VROGeDXyP9tzyjD3GrqDwwdcXFz/dVnhF
> > ktFiQeoMlfDcSjbcXztRaD4eRSM/EzK6aNL7eocK+s9EWn10Xvg6c+7IeYxMgy32
> > w9Q9WRFN/Gzmeawb0rNNiYdhEq/ufBpfN1+Un4XrpqPukydbv2JpaiG/VZBzldkw
> > UMepC/mpRx8HPw==
> > =yaww
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > 
> > commit 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b
> > Author: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Fri Apr 26 13:08:58 2024 +0200
> > 
> >     selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc
> >     
> >     nolibc gained an implementation of strerror() recently.
> >     Use it and drop the ifdeffery.
> >     
> >     Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
> > index 76c2a6945d3e..b8967b6e29d5 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
> > @@ -168,15 +168,7 @@ static inline __printf(1, 2) void ksft_print_msg(const char *msg, ...)
> >  
> >  static inline void ksft_perror(const char *msg)
> >  {
> > -#ifndef NOLIBC
> >  	ksft_print_msg("%s: %s (%d)\n", msg, strerror(errno), errno);
> > -#else
> > -	/*
> > -	 * nolibc doesn't provide strerror() and it seems
> > -	 * inappropriate to add one, just print the errno.
> > -	 */
> > -	ksft_print_msg("%s: %d)\n", msg, errno);
> > -#endif
> >  }
> >  
> >  static inline __printf(1, 2) void ksft_test_result_pass(const char *msg, ...)