Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] watchdog: imx7ulp_wdt: move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature

[Guenter Roeck]

On 7/15/24 11:34, Frank Li wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:01:04AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 7/15/24 10:07, Frank Li wrote:
> > > Move post_rcs_wait into struct imx_wdt_hw_feature to simplify code logic
> > > for different compatible strings
> > >
> > > i.MX93 and i.MX8ULP watchdog do not need to wait 2.5 clocks after RCS is
> > > done. Set post_rcs_wait to false explicitly to maintain code consistency.
> >
> > Why ? That is not necessary and typically frowned upon for static variables.
>
> Some maintainer in other subsystem like explicity set to false to read code
> easily even though not necessary for static variable espcially there are
> already one which set to false.
>
> I am fine for each ways. You are free to pick up v2 instead of v3 if you
> don't like v3's change.

That is not the point. The point here is that you made an - in my opinion
unnecessary - change to this patch while at the same time adding my
Reviewed-by: tag which applied to another version of the patch.
This is inappropriate. Please refrain from doing that in the future.

Guenter