Re: [PATCH] mm/hwpoison: reset hwpoison filter parameters in pfn_inject_exit()

[Miaohe Lin]

On 2024/7/16 4:33, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:28:06 +0800 Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> When hwpoison_inject module is removed, hwpoison_filter_* parameters
>> should be reset. Otherwise these parameters will have non-default values
>> at next insmod time.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/hwpoison-inject.c
>> +++ b/mm/hwpoison-inject.c
>> @@ -64,9 +64,20 @@ static int hwpoison_unpoison(void *data, u64 val)
>>  DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(hwpoison_fops, NULL, hwpoison_inject, "%lli\n");
>>  DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(unpoison_fops, NULL, hwpoison_unpoison, "%lli\n");
>>  
>> -static void __exit pfn_inject_exit(void)
>> +static inline void reset_hwpoison_filter(void)
>>  {
>>  	hwpoison_filter_enable = 0;
>> +	hwpoison_filter_dev_major = ~0U;
>> +	hwpoison_filter_dev_minor = ~0U;
>> +	hwpoison_filter_flags_mask = 0;
>> +	hwpoison_filter_flags_value = 0;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
>> +	hwpoison_filter_memcg = 0;
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __exit pfn_inject_exit(void)
>> +{
>>  	debugfs_remove_recursive(hwpoison_dir);
>>  }
> 
> The new reset_hwpoison_filter() has no callers?

I'm sorry but I can't figure out why that's missed. I remember I tested this patch
and queued it... Will send a new version and re-test it.
Thanks.
.