RE: Regression on linux-next (next-20240709)

[Borah, Chaitanya Kumar]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2024 2:23 PM
> To: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar <chaitanya.kumar.borah@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: jiangshan.ljs@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nikula, Jani
> <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>; Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen@xxxxxxxxx>; Kurmi,
> Suresh Kumar <suresh.kumar.kurmi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20240709)
> 
> Hello
> 
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 1:42 PM Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
> > commit 1726a17135905e2d2773f18d47bd4e17dd26e1ed
> > Author: Lai Jiangshan mailto:jiangshan.ljs@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date:   Thu Jul 4 11:49:13 2024 +0800
> >
> >     workqueue: Put PWQ allocation and WQ enlistment in the same lock C.S.
> > `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> >
> > We could not revert the patch because of merge conflict but resetting to the
> parent of the commit seems to fix the issue
> >
> > Could you please check why the patch causes this regression and provide a
> fix if necessary?
> 
> 
> It has been fixed and it is in wq/for-6.11.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZpASNBN0hpTVcjE-@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 

Thank you Lai for your response.

Regards

Chaitanya

> Thanks
> Lai