Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] dt-bindings: PCI: Cleanup of brcmstb YAML and add 7712 SoC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17/07/2024 15:20, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:51 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 16/07/2024 23:31, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>>> o Change order of the compatible strings to be alphabetical
>>>
>>> o Describe resets/reset-names before using them in rules
>>>
>>
>> <form letter>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
>> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
>> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
>> either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.
>>
>> Thank you.
>> </form letter>
> 
> I'm sorry Krzysztof, but AFAICT I paid attention to all of your comments and
> tried to answer them as best as I could.  Please do not resort to a
> form letter; if
> you think I missed something(s) please oblige me and say what it is rather than
> having  me search for something that you know and I do not.

I do not see your response at all to my comments on patch #2.

> 
>>
>>> o Add minItems/maxItems where needed.
>>>
>>> o Change maintainer: Nicolas has not been active for a while.  It also
>>>   makes sense for a Broadcom employee to be the maintainer as many of the
>>>   details are privy to Broadcom.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  .../bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml           | 26 ++++++++++++++-----
>>>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml
>>> index 11f8ea33240c..692f7ed7c98e 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,stb-pcie.yaml
>>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>  title: Brcmstb PCIe Host Controller
>>>
>>>  maintainers:
>>> -  - Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx>
>>> +  - Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>  properties:
>>>    compatible:
>>> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ properties:
>>>            - brcm,bcm2711-pcie # The Raspberry Pi 4
>>>            - brcm,bcm4908-pcie
>>>            - brcm,bcm7211-pcie # Broadcom STB version of RPi4
>>> -          - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm
>>>            - brcm,bcm7216-pcie # Broadcom 7216 Arm
>>> -          - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm
>>> +          - brcm,bcm7278-pcie # Broadcom 7278 Arm
>>>            - brcm,bcm7425-pcie # Broadcom 7425 MIPs
>>>            - brcm,bcm7435-pcie # Broadcom 7435 MIPs
>>> +          - brcm,bcm7445-pcie # Broadcom 7445 Arm
>>>
>>>    reg:
>>>      maxItems: 1
>>> @@ -95,6 +95,18 @@ properties:
>>>        minItems: 1
>>>        maxItems: 3
>>>
>>> +  resets:
>>> +    minItems: 1
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - description: reset for external PCIe PERST# signal # perst
>>> +      - description: reset for phy reset calibration       # rescal
>>> +
>>> +  reset-names:
>>> +    minItems: 1
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - const: perst
>>> +      - const: rescal
>>
>> There are no devices with two resets. Anyway, this does not match one of
>> your variants which have first element as rescal.
> 
> The 4908 chip exclusively uses the "perst" reset, and the  7216 chip
> exclusively uses the "rescal" reset.   The rest of the chips use zero
> resets.   All together, there are two resets.

This is not enum, but a list. What you do mean overall two resets? You
have a chip which is both 4908 and 7216 at the same time? How is this
possible?

> 
> You are the one that wanted me to first list all resets at the top,
> and refer to them by the conditional rules.

No, I wanted widest constraints at the top.

My comment at v2 was already saying this:

"This does not match what you have in conditional, so just keep min and
max Items here."

and you have numerous examples in the code for this.

Best regards,
Krzysztof