Re: [RESEND PATCH net-next v3 3/4] net: phy: aquantia: wait for the GLOBAL_CFG to start returning real values

From: Jon Hunter
Date: Thu Jul 18 2024 - 10:09:04 EST



On 18/07/2024 14:29, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 3:04 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 2:23 PM Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


With the current -next and mainline we are seeing the following issue on
our Tegra234 Jetson AGX Orin platform ...

Aquantia AQR113C stmmac-0:00: aqr107_fill_interface_modes failed: -110
tegra-mgbe 6800000.ethernet eth0: __stmmac_open: Cannot attach to PHY (error: -110)


We have tracked it down to this change and looks like our PHY does not
support 10M ...

$ ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
Supported ports: [ ]
Supported link modes: 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
10000baseT/Full
1000baseKX/Full
10000baseKX4/Full
10000baseKR/Full
2500baseT/Full
5000baseT/Full

The following fixes this for this platform ...

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_main.c b/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_main.c
index d12e35374231..0b2db486d8bd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/aquantia/aquantia_main.c
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static int aqr107_fill_interface_modes(struct phy_device *phydev)
int i, val, ret;

ret = phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1,
- VEND1_GLOBAL_CFG_10M, val, val != 0,
+ VEND1_GLOBAL_CFG_100M, val, val != 0,
1000, 100000, false);
if (ret)
return ret;


However, I am not sure if this is guaranteed to work for all?

Ah cr*p. No, I don't think it is. We should take the first supported
mode for a given PHY I think.


TBH I only observed the issue on AQR115C. I don't have any other model
to test with. Is it fine to fix it by implementing
aqr115_fill_interface_modes() that would first wait for this register
to return non-0 and then call aqr107_fill_interface_modes()?

I am doing a bit more testing. We have seen a few issues with this PHY driver and so I am wondering if we also need something similar for the AQR113C variant too.

Interestingly, the product brief for these PHYs [0] do show that both the AQR113C and AQR115C both support 10M. So I wonder if it is our ethernet controller that is not supporting 10M? I will check on this too.

Jon

[0] https://www.marvell.com/content/dam/marvell/en/public-collateral/transceivers/marvell-phys-transceivers-aqrate-gen4-product-brief.pdf


--
nvpublic