Re: [PATCH v1] x86/amd_nb: Add new PCI IDs for AMD family 0x1a model 60h

From: Yazen Ghannam
Date: Thu Jul 18 2024 - 11:43:44 EST


On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 07:32:58PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> Add the new PCI Device IDs to the root IDs and misc ids list to support
> new generation of AMD 1Ah family 60h Models of processors.

Please be consistent with formatting.

"Device" -> "device"

"misc ids" -> "misc IDs"

"Models" -> "models"

Also, you have "0x1A" in the $SUBJECT, but you have "1Ah" in the commit
message. I suggest staying with "1Ah" as that is the format used in AMD
documentation.

And "v1" is not necessary in the "[PATCH]" prefix.

Furthermore, if you CC the "x86" alias, then you don't need to CC the
individual x86 maintainers.

>
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> (As the amd_nb functions are used by PMC and PMF drivers, without these IDs
> being present AMD PMF/PMC probe shall fail.)

This comment can go in the commit message. Otherwise, it'll be lost from
the git history.

The comment is helpful in that it gives a reason *why* these new IDs are
needed.

>
> arch/x86/kernel/amd_nb.c | 3 +++
> include/linux/pci_ids.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_nb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_nb.c
> index 059e5c16af05..61eadde08511 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_nb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_nb.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_M70H_ROOT 0x14e8
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_1AH_M00H_ROOT 0x153a
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_1AH_M20H_ROOT 0x1507
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_1AH_M60H_ROOT 0x1122
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_MI200_ROOT 0x14bb
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_MI300_ROOT 0x14f8
>
> @@ -63,6 +64,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id amd_root_ids[] = {
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_M70H_ROOT) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_1AH_M00H_ROOT) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_1AH_M20H_ROOT) },
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_1AH_M60H_ROOT) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_MI200_ROOT) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_MI300_ROOT) },
> {}
> @@ -95,6 +97,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id amd_nb_misc_ids[] = {
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_M78H_DF_F3) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_1AH_M00H_DF_F3) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_1AH_M20H_DF_F3) },
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_1AH_M60H_DF_F3) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_1AH_M70H_DF_F3) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_MI200_DF_F3) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_MI300_DF_F3) },
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> index 76a8f2d6bd64..bbe8f3dfa813 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> @@ -580,6 +580,7 @@
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_M78H_DF_F3 0x12fb
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_1AH_M00H_DF_F3 0x12c3
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_1AH_M20H_DF_F3 0x16fb
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_1AH_M60H_DF_F3 0x124b
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_1AH_M70H_DF_F3 0x12bb
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_MI200_DF_F3 0x14d3
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_MI300_DF_F3 0x152b
> --

I can confirm that the IDs are correct.

Besides the formatting issues, this looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@xxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Yazen