Re: [PATCH] arm64/sysreg: Correct the values for GICv4.1

[Marc Zyngier]

On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 22:55:32 +0100,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Currently, sysreg has value as 0b0010 for the presence of GICv4.1 in
> ID_PFR1_EL1 and ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, instead of 0b0011 as per ARM ARM.
> Hence, correct them to reflect ARM ARM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> index a4c1dd4741a47..7ceaa1e0b4bc2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ Res0	63:32
>  UnsignedEnum	31:28	GIC
>  	0b0000	NI
>  	0b0001	GICv3
> -	0b0010	GICv4p1
> +	0b0011	GICv4p1
>  EndEnum
>  UnsignedEnum	27:24	Virt_frac
>  	0b0000	NI
> @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ EndEnum
>  UnsignedEnum	27:24	GIC
>  	0b0000	NI
>  	0b0001	IMP
> -	0b0010	V4P1
> +	0b0011	V4P1

I wonder why we have different naming schemes for the same feature...

>  EndEnum
>  SignedEnum	23:20	AdvSIMD
>  	0b0000	IMP
> 

Yup, this looks correct and checks out against revision H.b of the GICv3
spec, revision K.a of the ARM ARM, and even I.a (which the original
patches were referencing).

Once more, it shows that these dumps should be automatically generated
from the XML instead of (creatively) hand-written.

Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.