Re: [PATCH] kexec: Use atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire() in kexec_trylock()

[Baoquan He]

On 07/19/24 at 12:38pm, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Use atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(*ptr, &old, new) instead of
> atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(*ptr, old, new) == old in kexec_trylock().
> x86 CMPXCHG instruction returns success in ZF flag, so
> this change saves a compare after cmpxchg.

Seems it can simplify code even though on non-x86 arch, should we
replace atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire() with atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire()
in all similar places?

For this one,

Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/kexec_internal.h | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_internal.h b/kernel/kexec_internal.h
> index 2595defe8c0d..d35d9792402d 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_internal.h
> @@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ int kimage_is_destination_range(struct kimage *image,
>  extern atomic_t __kexec_lock;
>  static inline bool kexec_trylock(void)
>  {
> -	return atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&__kexec_lock, 0, 1) == 0;
> +	int old = 0;
> +	return atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&__kexec_lock, &old, 1);
>  }
>  static inline void kexec_unlock(void)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.42.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
>