Re: [PATCH v11 1/6] dt-bindings: media: platform: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti Video Input Interface

From: Laurent Pinchart
Date: Mon Jul 22 2024 - 11:22:08 EST


Hello Ishikawa-san,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 09:08:43AM +0900, Yuji Ishikawa wrote:
> Adds the Device Tree binding documentation that allows to describe
> the Video Input Interface found in Toshiba Visconti SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishikawa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changelog v2:
> - no change
>
> Changelog v3:
> - no change
>
> Changelog v4:
> - fix style problems at the v3 patch
> - remove "index" member
> - update example
>
> Changelog v5:
> - no change
>
> Changelog v6:
> - add register definition of BUS-IF and MPU
>
> Changelog v7:
> - remove trailing "bindings" from commit header message
> - remove trailing "Device Tree Bindings" from title
> - fix text wrapping of description
> - change compatible to visconti5-viif
> - explicitly define allowed properties for port::endpoint
>
> Changelog v8:
> - Suggestion from Krzysztof Kozlowski
> - rename bindings description file
> - use block style array instead of inline style
> - remove clock-lane (as it is fixed at position 0)
> - update sample node's name
> - use lowercase hex for literals
> - Suggestion from Laurent Pinchart
> - update description message port::description
> - remove port::endpoint::bus-type as it is fixed to <4>
> - remove port::endpoint::clock-lanes from example
> - add port::endpoint::data-lanes to required parameters list
> - fix sequence of data-lanes: <1 2 3 4> because current driver does not support data reordering
> - update port::endpoint::data-lanes::description
> - remove redundant type definition for port::endpoint::data-lanes
>
> Changelog v9:
> - place "required" after "properties"
> - dictionary ordering of properties
>
> Changelog v10:
> - no change
>
> Changelog v11:
> - no change
>
> .../media/toshiba,visconti5-viif.yaml | 105 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/toshiba,visconti5-viif.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/toshiba,visconti5-viif.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/toshiba,visconti5-viif.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..97e8bda427
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/toshiba,visconti5-viif.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/toshiba,visconti5-viif.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Toshiba Visconti5 SoC Video Input Interface
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |-
> + Toshiba Visconti5 SoC Video Input Interface (VIIF) receives MIPI CSI2 video
> + stream, processes the stream with image signal processors (L1ISP, L2ISP),
> + then stores pictures to main memory.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: toshiba,visconti5-viif
> +
> + reg:
> + items:
> + - description: Registers for capture control
> + - description: Registers for CSI2 receiver control
> + - description: Registers for bus interface unit control
> + - description: Registers for Memory Protection Unit

Is this part of the VIIF, or some sort of more standalone IOMMU ? In the
latter case, should it be handled by a separate driver ?

> +
> + interrupts:
> + items:
> + - description: Sync Interrupt
> + - description: Status (Error) Interrupt
> + - description: CSI2 Receiver Interrupt
> + - description: L1ISP Interrupt
> +
> + port:
> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> + description: CSI-2 input port, with a single endpoint connected to the CSI-2 transmitter.
> +
> + properties:
> + endpoint:
> + $ref: video-interfaces.yaml#
> + additionalProperties: false
> +
> + properties:
> + data-lanes:
> + description: VIIF supports 1, 2, 3 or 4 data lanes
> + minItems: 1
> + items:
> + - const: 1
> + - const: 2
> + - const: 3
> + - const: 4
> +
> + clock-noncontinuous: true
> + link-frequencies: true
> + remote-endpoint: true
> +
> + required:
> + - clock-noncontinuous

Does the hardware support the non-continuous clock mode only, or is it
configurable ? This is a boolean property, so if both mode are
supported, the property should not be required.

> + - data-lanes
> + - link-frequencies
> + - remote-endpoint
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - interrupts
> + - port
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +
> + soc {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + video@1c000000 {
> + compatible = "toshiba,visconti5-viif";
> + reg = <0 0x1c000000 0 0x6000>,
> + <0 0x1c008000 0 0x400>,
> + <0 0x1c00e000 0 0x1000>,
> + <0 0x2417a000 0 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 64 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 67 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 73 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 76 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +
> + port {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + csi_in0: endpoint {
> + clock-noncontinuous;
> + data-lanes = <1 2>;
> + link-frequencies = /bits/ 64 <456000000>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&imx219_out0>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart