Re: [PATCH] perf scripts python arm-cs-trace-disasm.py: Skip disasm if address continuity is broken
From: James Clark
Date: Tue Jul 23 2024 - 09:10:50 EST
On 22/07/2024 11:02 am, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
Hi James,
On 19-07-2024 08:09 pm, James Clark wrote:
On 19/07/2024 10:26 am, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
To generate the instruction tracing, script uses 2 contiguous packets
address range. If there a continuity brake due to discontiguous branch
address, it is required to reset the tracing and start tracing with the
new set of contiguous packets.
Adding change to identify the break and complete the remaining tracing
of current packets and restart tracing from new set of packets, if
continuity is established.
Hi Ganapatrao,
Can you add a before and after example of what's changed to the commit
message? It wasn't immediately obvious to me if this is adding missing
output, or it was correcting the tail end of the output that was
previously wrong.
It is adding tail end of the trace as well avoiding the segfault of the
perf application. With out this change the perf segfaults with as below log
./perf script --script=python:./scripts/python/arm-cs-trace-disasm.py --
-d objdump -k ../../vmlinux -v $* > dump
objdump: error: the stop address should be after the start address
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./scripts/python/arm-cs-trace-disasm.py", line 271, in
process_event
print_disam(dso_fname, dso_vm_start, start_addr, stop_addr)
File "./scripts/python/arm-cs-trace-disasm.py", line 105, in print_disam
for line in read_disam(dso_fname, dso_start, start_addr, stop_addr):
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "./scripts/python/arm-cs-trace-disasm.py", line 99, in read_disam
disasm_output = check_output(disasm).decode('utf-8').split('\n')
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/subprocess.py", line 466, in check_output
return run(*popenargs, stdout=PIPE, timeout=timeout, check=True,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib64/python3.12/subprocess.py", line 571, in run
raise CalledProcessError(retcode, process.args,
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['objdump', '-d', '-z',
'--start-address=0xffff80008125b758',
'--stop-address=0xffff80008125a934', '../../vmlinux']' returned non-zero
exit status 1.
Fatal Python error: handler_call_die: problem in Python trace event handler
Python runtime state: initialized
Current thread 0x0000ffffb05054e0 (most recent call first):
<no Python frame>
Extension modules: perf_trace_context, systemd._journal,
systemd._reader, systemd.id128, report._py3report, _dbus_bindings,
problem._py3abrt (total: 7)
Aborted (core dumped)
Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/scripts/python/arm-cs-trace-disasm.py | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/scripts/python/arm-cs-trace-disasm.py
b/tools/perf/scripts/python/arm-cs-trace-disasm.py
index d973c2baed1c..ad10cee2c35e 100755
--- a/tools/perf/scripts/python/arm-cs-trace-disasm.py
+++ b/tools/perf/scripts/python/arm-cs-trace-disasm.py
@@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ def process_event(param_dict):
cpu_data[str(cpu) + 'addr'] = addr
return
+ if (cpu_data.get(str(cpu) + 'ip') == None):
+ cpu_data[str(cpu) + 'ip'] = ip
+
Do you need to write into the global cpu_data here? Doesn't it get
overwritten after you load it back into 'prev_ip'
No, the logic is same as holding the addr of previous packet.
Saving the previous packet saved ip in to prev_ip before overwriting
with the current packet.
It's not exactly the same logic as holding the addr of the previous
sample. For addr, we return on the first None, with your change we now
"pretend" that the second one is also the previous one:
if (cpu_data.get(str(cpu) + 'addr') == None):
cpu_data[str(cpu) + 'addr'] = addr
return <----------------------------sample 0 return
if (cpu_data.get(str(cpu) + 'ip') == None):
cpu_data[str(cpu) + 'ip'] = ip <---- sample 1 save but no return
Then for sample 1 'prev_ip' is actually now the 'current' IP:
prev_ip = cpu_data[str(cpu) + 'ip']
This means that prev_ip is sometimes the previous sample's IP only
sometimes (samples following 1), otherwise it's the current IP. Does
your fix actually require this bit? Because we already save the 'real'
previous one:
cpu_data[str(cpu) + 'ip'] = stop_addr
Also normally we save ip + 4 (stop_addr), where as you save ip. It's not
clear why there is no need to add the 4?
prev_ip = cpu_data[str(cpu) + 'ip']
... then ...
# Record for previous sample packet
cpu_data[str(cpu) + 'addr'] = addr
cpu_data[str(cpu) + 'ip'] = stop_addr
Would a local variable not accomplish the same thing?
No, We need global to hold the ip of previous packet.
+ prev_ip = cpu_data[str(cpu) + 'ip']
if (options.verbose == True):
print("Event type: %s" % name)
@@ -243,12 +247,18 @@ def process_event(param_dict):
# Record for previous sample packet
cpu_data[str(cpu) + 'addr'] = addr
+ cpu_data[str(cpu) + 'ip'] = stop_addr
# Handle CS_ETM_TRACE_ON packet if start_addr=0 and stop_addr=4
if (start_addr == 0 and stop_addr == 4):
print("CPU%d: CS_ETM_TRACE_ON packet is inserted" % cpu)
return
+ if (stop_addr < start_addr):
+ # Continuity of the Packets broken, set start_addr to previous
+ # packet ip to complete the remaining tracing of the address
range.
After looking a bit more I'm also not sure why stop_addr < start_addr
signifies a discontinuity. What if the discontinuity ends up with
stop_addr > start_addr? There's no reason it can't jump forwards as well
as backwards.
Can you share the 3 samples from the --verbose output to the script that
cause the issue?
I see discontinuities as having the branch source (ip) set to 0 which is
what we do at the start:
Sample = { cpu: 0000 addr: 0x0000ffffb807adac phys_addr:
0x0000000000000000 ip: 0x0000000000000000 pid: 28388 }
Then the ending one has the branch target (addr) set to 0:
Sample = { cpu: 0000 addr: 0x0000000000000000 phys_addr:
0x0000000000000000 ip: 0x0000ffffb7eee168 pid: 28388 }
And it doesn't hit objdump because of the range check:
Start address 0x0 is out of range ...
So I don't see any missing disassembly or crashes for this.
+ start_addr = prev_ip
+
if (start_addr < int(dso_start) or start_addr > int(dso_end)):
print("Start address 0x%x is out of range [ 0x%x .. 0x%x ]
for dso %s" % (start_addr, int(dso_start), int(dso_end), dso))
return
Thanks,
Ganapat