Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Remove the prefetch() specific implementation on x86_64

[Youling Tang]

Hi,

On 30/05/2024 23:26, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> On 29.05.24 г. 6:20 ч., Youling Tang wrote:
> > From: Youling Tang <tangyouling@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > After commit ab483570a13b ("x86 & generic: change to 
> > __builtin_prefetch()"),
> > x86_64 directly uses __builtin_prefetch() without the specific 
> > implementation
> > of prefetch(). Also, x86_64 use a generic definition until commit 
> > ae2e15eb3b6c
> > ("x86: unify prefetch operations"). So remove it.
>
>
> So this patch just ensures the x86-specific prefetch() implementation 
> is defined only for 32bit case, otherwise we have it defined for the 
> 64bit case as well but effectively it's not used since 
> ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH is not defined for 64bit, meaning in the 64bit case 
> prefetch() is still defined to __builtint_prefetch in 
> include/linux/prefetch.h.
>
>
> In essence this is a purely cosmetic cleanup , am I right?
>
>
> I compiled a file that utilizes prefetch with and without your patch 
> and the generated assembly is identical.
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@xxxxxxxx>
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 7 ++++---
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h 
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> > index cb4f6c513c48..44371bdcc59d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> > @@ -599,9 +599,6 @@ extern char            ignore_fpu_irq;
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> >   # define BASE_PREFETCH        ""
> >   # define ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH
> > -#else
> > -# define BASE_PREFETCH        "prefetcht0 %1"
> > -#endif
> >     /*
> >    * Prefetch instructions for Pentium III (+) and AMD Athlon (+)
> > @@ -616,6 +613,10 @@ static inline void prefetch(const void *x)
> >                 "m" (*(const char *)x));
> >   }
> >   +#else
> > +# define BASE_PREFETCH        "prefetcht0 %1"
> > +#endif
> > +
> >   /*
> >    * 3dnow prefetch to get an exclusive cache line.
> >    * Useful for spinlocks to avoid one state transition in the
Sorry to bother you, but do we still need this patchset? (Do I need to
modify the commit message and send v2 if necessary?)

Thanks,
Youling.