RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: xilinx-xdma: Add schemas for Xilinx QDMA PCIe Root Port Bridge

[Havalige, Thippeswamy]

Hi Conor Dooley,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2024 10:15 PM
> To: Havalige, Thippeswamy <thippeswamy.havalige@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx; kw@xxxxxxxxx; robh@xxxxxxxxxx;
> bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Havalige, Thippeswamy
> <thippeswamy.havalige@xxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> Simek, Michal <michal.simek@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: xilinx-xdma: Add schemas for
> Xilinx QDMA PCIe Root Port Bridge
> 
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:55:57AM +0530, Thippeswamy Havalige wrote:
> > Add YAML devicetree schemas for Xilinx QDMA Soft IP PCIe Root Port
> Bridge.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thippeswamy Havalige <thippesw@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/pci/xlnx,xdma-host.yaml          | 41 ++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > ---
> > changes in v2
> > - update dt node label with pcie.
> > ---
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xlnx,xdma-host.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xlnx,xdma-host.yaml
> > index 2f59b3a73dd2..28d9350a7fb4 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xlnx,xdma-host.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xlnx,xdma-host.yaml
> > @@ -14,10 +14,21 @@ allOf:
> >
> >  properties:
> >    compatible:
> > -    const: xlnx,xdma-host-3.00
> > +    enum:
> > +      - xlnx,xdma-host-3.00
> > +      - xlnx,qdma-host-3.00
> >
> >    reg:
> > -    maxItems: 1
> > +    items:
> > +      - description: configuration region and XDMA bridge register.
> > +      - description: QDMA bridge register.
> 
> Please constrain the new entry to only the new compatible.
- Thanks, I ll resend patch with required changes.
> 
> > +    minItems: 1
> > +
> > +  reg-names:
> > +    items:
> > +      - const: cfg
> > +      - const: breg
> > +    minItems: 1
> >
> >    ranges:
> >      maxItems: 2
> > @@ -111,4 +122,30 @@ examples:
> >                  interrupt-controller;
> >              };
> >          };
> > +
> > +        pcie@80000000 {
> 
> tbh, don't see the point of a new example for this.
- For this in both examples ranges properties are different. So, here I wanted to make sure that our example device tree bindings work straight forward when our reference designs are used.
> 
> > +            compatible = "xlnx,qdma-host-3.00";
> > +            reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x10000000>, <0x0 0x90000000 0x0
> 0x10000000>;
> > +            reg-names = "cfg", "breg";
> > +            ranges = <0x2000000 0x0 0xa8000000 0x0 0xa8000000 0x0
> 0x8000000>,
> > +                     <0x43000000 0x4 0x80000000 0x4 0x80000000 0x0
> 0x40000000>;
> > +            #address-cells = <3>;
> > +            #size-cells = <2>;
> > +            #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > +            device_type = "pci";
> > +            interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > +            interrupts = <GIC_SPI 84 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, <GIC_SPI 85
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +                         <GIC_SPI 86 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +            interrupt-names = "misc", "msi0", "msi1";
> > +            interrupt-map-mask = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x7>;
> > +            interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &pcie_intc_0 0>,
> > +                            <0 0 0 2 &pcie_intc_0 1>,
> > +                            <0 0 0 3 &pcie_intc_0 2>,
> > +                            <0 0 0 4 &pcie_intc_0 3>;
> > +            pcie_intc_1: interrupt-controller {
> > +                #address-cells = <0>;
> > +                #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > +                interrupt-controller;
> > +            };
> > +        };
> >      };
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >

Regards,
Thippeswamy H