[PATCH v2 3/4] ext4: fix incorrect tid assumption in jbd2_journal_shrink_checkpoint_list()

From: Luis Henriques (SUSE)
Date: Wed Jul 24 2024 - 12:12:22 EST


Function jbd2_journal_shrink_checkpoint_list() assumes that '0' is not a
valid value for transaction IDs, which is incorrect. Don't assume that and
use two extra boolean variables to control the loop iterations and keep
track of the first and last tid.

Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques (SUSE) <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
index 77bc522e6821..98a0b2eb84f5 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
@@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ unsigned long jbd2_journal_shrink_checkpoint_list(journal_t *journal,
tid_t tid = 0;
unsigned long nr_freed = 0;
unsigned long freed;
+ bool first_set = false;

again:
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
@@ -429,8 +430,10 @@ unsigned long jbd2_journal_shrink_checkpoint_list(journal_t *journal,
else
transaction = journal->j_checkpoint_transactions;

- if (!first_tid)
+ if (!first_set) {
first_tid = transaction->t_tid;
+ first_set = true;
+ }
last_transaction = journal->j_checkpoint_transactions->t_cpprev;
next_transaction = transaction;
last_tid = last_transaction->t_tid;
@@ -460,7 +463,7 @@ unsigned long jbd2_journal_shrink_checkpoint_list(journal_t *journal,
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
cond_resched();

- if (*nr_to_scan && next_tid)
+ if (*nr_to_scan && journal->j_shrink_transaction)
goto again;
out:
trace_jbd2_shrink_checkpoint_list(journal, first_tid, tid, last_tid,