Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/panel: add BOE tv101wum-ll2 panel driver

From: Doug Anderson
Date: Wed Jul 24 2024 - 12:15:49 EST


Hi,

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 12:51 AM Neil Armstrong
<neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >> +// Generated with linux-mdss-dsi-panel-driver-generator from vendor device tree:
> >> +// Copyright (c) 2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> >> +// Copyright (c) 2024, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> >> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> >> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >> +#include <linux/of.h>
> >
> > nit: sort header files?
>
> Will do while I'm it, but I don't personally care of the include order..

FWIW: the main reason I push for sorting in cases like this is to
avoid merge conflicts as the driver changes. If everyone adds new
#includes at the end then every change will cause a merge conflict. If
things are kept sorted it's still possible to get a merge conflict but
the number goes down. Probably not super relevant in such a simple
driver but just the policy I push for in general.

The criteria for sorting doesn't matter to me (some people put
"nested" includes in separate sections and some just do a normal sort)
as long as it's obvious / consistent for a given file.

-Doug