[PATCH v6 8/8] RISC-V: hwprobe: Document unaligned vector perf key
From: Jesse Taube
Date: Wed Jul 24 2024 - 14:38:25 EST
Document key for reporting the speed of unaligned vector accesses.
The descriptions are the same as the scalar equivalent values.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
V1 -> V2:
- New patch
V2 -> V3:
- Specify access width
V3 -> V4:
- Clarify we're talking about byte accesses using vector registers
- Spell out _VECTOR_ in macros
V4 -> V5:
- No changes
V5 -> V6:
- No changes
---
Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
index 78acd37b6477..f83a13dc4cbc 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst
@@ -238,3 +238,19 @@ The following keys are defined:
* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE`: An unsigned int which
represents the size of the Zicboz block in bytes.
+
+* :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_VECTOR_MISALIGNED_PERF`: An enum value describing the
+ performance of misaligned vector accesses on the selected set of processors.
+
+ * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_VECTOR_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN`: The performance of misaligned
+ vector accesses is unknown.
+
+ * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_VECTOR_MISALIGNED_SLOW`: 32-bit misaligned accesses using vector
+ registers are slower than the equivalent quantity of byte accesses via vector registers.
+ Misaligned accesses may be supported directly in hardware, or trapped and emulated by software.
+
+ * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_VECTOR_MISALIGNED_FAST`: 32-bit misaligned accesses using vector
+ registers are faster than the equivalent quantity of byte accesses via vector registers.
+
+ * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_VECTOR_MISALIGNED_UNSUPPORTED`: Misaligned vector accesses are
+ not supported at all and will generate a misaligned address fault.
--
2.45.2