Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] task_stack: uninline stack_not_used

From: Shakeel Butt
Date: Wed Jul 24 2024 - 16:51:17 EST

Next message: Shakeel Butt: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: memcg: don't call propagate_protected_usage() needlessly"
Previous message: Pali Rohár: "Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] platform/x86:dell-laptop: remove duplicate code w/ battery function"
In reply to: Pasha Tatashin: "[PATCH v5 3/3] task_stack: uninline stack_not_used"
Next in thread: Pasha Tatashin: "Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] task_stack: uninline stack_not_used"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 08:33:22PM GMT, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> Given that stack_not_used() is not performance critical function
> uninline it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx>

Next message: Shakeel Butt: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: memcg: don't call propagate_protected_usage() needlessly"
Previous message: Pali Rohár: "Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] platform/x86:dell-laptop: remove duplicate code w/ battery function"
In reply to: Pasha Tatashin: "[PATCH v5 3/3] task_stack: uninline stack_not_used"
Next in thread: Pasha Tatashin: "Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] task_stack: uninline stack_not_used"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]