Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: Don't take direct pointers into BTF data from st_ops

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:14:58 -0500 you wrote:
> In struct bpf_struct_ops, we have take a pointer to a BTF type name, and
> a struct btf_type. This was presumably done for convenience, but can
> actually result in subtle and confusing bugs given that BTF data can be
> invalidated before a program is loaded. For example, in sched_ext, we
> may sometimes resize a data section after a skeleton has been opened,
> but before the struct_ops scheduler map has been loaded. This may cause
> the BTF data to be realloc'd, which can then cause a UAF when loading
> the program because the struct_ops map has pointers directly into the
> BTF data.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,1/2] libbpf: Don't take direct pointers into BTF data from st_ops
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/7244100e0389
  - [bpf-next,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for resizing data map with struct_ops
    (no matching commit)

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html