Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] Add support for Intel PPS Generator

[gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 09:05:02AM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> On 24/07/24 23:39, Hall, Christopher S wrote:
> > Hello Rodolfo,
> > 
> > > From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 15, 2024 2:37 AM
> > 
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] Add support for Intel PPS Generator
> > > 
> > > On 15/07/24 10:06, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 04 2024 at 13:50, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> > > > > On 03/07/24 16:47, D, Lakshmi Sowjanya wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > A gentle reminder for the review of the pps patchset.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I already acked these patchset, didn't I? =8-o
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please let me know if I missed something.
> > > > 
> > > > Sorry, I missed that V10 posting. It's too late now.
> > > > 
> > > > Rodolfo, can you pick it up after rc1 for the next merge window. All
> > > > prerequisites should be in Linus tree then.
> > > 
> > > LinuxPPS has no dedicated tree as other Linux subsystems. Usually I send my
> > > "Acked" to Greg Kroah-Hartman and Andrew Morton, and they push patches
> > > by
> > > themselves.
> > 
> > Is the PPS driver on track to be included in the 6.11 release candidate?
> 
> I hope so! ^_^"

Are the patches in linux-next?  If so, what tree did they go through?
If not, they can't be merged into 6.11-rc1.

> Unluckily the LinuxPPS is a minor subsystem with no dedicated tree, and
> inclusion is not under my control.

I pick up many "smaller" driver subsystems all the time, I just have to
be asked to do so...

thanks,

greg k-h