Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: dwc: Add dbi_phys_addr and atu_phys_addr to struct dw_pcie

[Prudhvi Yarlagadda]

Hi Bjorn,

Thanks for the review comments.

On 7/24/2024 11:39 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 07:27:18PM -0700, Prudhvi Yarlagadda wrote:
>> Both DBI and ATU physical base addresses are needed by pcie_qcom.c
>> driver to program the location of DBI and ATU blocks in Qualcomm
>> PCIe Controller specific PARF hardware block.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Prudhvi Yarlagadda <quic_pyarlaga@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Mayank Rana <quic_mrana@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 2 ++
>>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 2 ++
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> index 1b5aba1f0c92..bc3a5d6b0177 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
>> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ int dw_pcie_get_resources(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>>  		pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(pci->dev, res);
>>  		if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
>>  			return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
>> +		pci->dbi_phys_addr = res->start;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	/* DBI2 is mainly useful for the endpoint controller */
>> @@ -134,6 +135,7 @@ int dw_pcie_get_resources(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>>  			pci->atu_base = devm_ioremap_resource(pci->dev, res);
>>  			if (IS_ERR(pci->atu_base))
>>  				return PTR_ERR(pci->atu_base);
>> +			pci->atu_phys_addr = res->start;
>>  		} else {
>>  			pci->atu_base = pci->dbi_base + DEFAULT_DBI_ATU_OFFSET;
>>  		}
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>> index 53c4c8f399c8..efc72989330c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
>> @@ -407,8 +407,10 @@ struct dw_pcie_ops {
>>  struct dw_pcie {
>>  	struct device		*dev;
>>  	void __iomem		*dbi_base;
>> +	phys_addr_t		dbi_phys_addr;
>>  	void __iomem		*dbi_base2;
>>  	void __iomem		*atu_base;
>> +	phys_addr_t		atu_phys_addr;
>>  	size_t			atu_size;
>>  	u32			num_ib_windows;
>>  	u32			num_ob_windows;
> 
> This patch is pretty trivial and it doesn't show anything to justify
> the need to keep these addresses.  I think this should be squashed
> with the next patch that actually *uses* them.
> 

ACK. I will update it in the next patch.

Thanks,
Prudhvi