Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: aw9610x: Add bindings for aw9610x sensor

[wangshuaijie]

On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 15:54:10 +0200, krzk@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>On 25/07/2024 15:17, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
>> 
>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 12:12:51 +0000, wangshuaijie@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> From: shuaijie wang <wangshuaijie@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Add device tree bindings for aw9610x proximity sensor.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: shuaijie wang <wangshuaijie@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  .../iio/proximity/awinic,aw9610x.yaml         | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/awinic,aw9610x.yaml
>>>
>> 
>> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
>> 
>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>> 
>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>> /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/awinic,aw9610x.yaml: $id: Cannot determine base path from $id, relative path/filename doesn't match actual path or filename
>>  	 $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/input/awinic,aw9610x.yaml
>>  	file: /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/proximity/awinic,aw9610x.yaml
>
>Look, still not tested.
>
>You got comment on v3 that you must it prior to sending. The comment
>also explained how to perform the testing.
>
>You responded that you will implement testing but as easily we can see
>here, you still did not test it.
>
>Please, stop wasting our time. TEST your patches BEFORE sending.
>
>Best regards,
>Krzysztof

Hi Krzysztof,

I'm extremely sorry for wasting your time, and I feel incredibly guilty
about it. I did see the information before, but for some reason, I didn't
submit the correct patch. I apologize again for the inconvenience. I will
fix this issue in the next version.

Kind regards,
Wang Shuaijie