Re: [PATCH v1 08/10] arm64: dts: aspeed: Add initial AST27XX device tree

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Fri Jul 26 2024 - 07:20:19 EST

Next message: Rick Wertenbroek: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: endpoint: Introduce 'get_bar' to map fixed address BARs in EPC"
Previous message: Konrad Dybcio: "Re: [PATCH 0/3] Update Konrad Dybcio's email addresses"
In reply to: Kevin Chen: "[PATCH v1 08/10] arm64: dts: aspeed: Add initial AST27XX device tree"
Next in thread: Kevin Chen: "[PATCH v1 09/10] arm64: dts: aspeed: Add initial AST2700 EVB device tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 26/07/2024 13:03, Kevin Chen wrote:
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g7.dtsi | 217 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 218 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g7.dtsi
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile
> index 21cd3a87f385..c909c19dc5dd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile
> @@ -34,3 +34,4 @@ subdir-y += tesla
> subdir-y += ti
> subdir-y += toshiba
> subdir-y += xilinx
> +subdir-y += aspeed
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g7.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g7.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..858ab95251e4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-g7.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-clk.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/aspeed,ast2700-reset.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/aspeed-scu-ic.h>
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Aspeed BMC";

Model of what? No, drop.

> + compatible = "aspeed,ast2700";

Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Then please
run `scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict` and (probably) fix more warnings.
Some warnings can be ignored, especially from --strict run, but the code
here looks like it needs a fix. Feel free to get in touch if the warning
is not clear.

> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> +
> + aliases {
> + serial12 = &uart12;

Nope. Such aliases are board specific.

> + };
> +
> + cpus {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + cpu@0 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a35";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + reg = <0>;
> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
> + next-level-cache = <&l2>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu@1 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a35";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + reg = <1>;
> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
> + next-level-cache = <&l2>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu@2 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a35";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + reg = <2>;
> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
> + next-level-cache = <&l2>;
> + };
> +
> + cpu@3 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a35";
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + reg = <3>;
> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
> + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
> + d-cache-sets = <128>;
> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
> + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
> + i-cache-sets = <256>;
> + next-level-cache = <&l2>;
> + };
> +
> + l2: l2-cache0 {
> + compatible = "cache";
> + cache-size = <0x80000>;
> + cache-line-size = <64>;
> + cache-sets = <1024>;
> + cache-level = <2>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + pmu {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a35-pmu";
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> + };
> +
> + psci {

Order the nodes according to DTS coding style.

Fix all your patches:
1. To pass flawlessly checkpatch (you did not run it)
2. To pass dt_binding_check and dtbs_check (you did not run these)
3. To adhere to kernel coding style
4. To adhere to DTS coding style

> + compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
> + method = "smc";
> + };
> +
> + gic: interrupt-controller@12200000 {

Nope, this cannot be outside of SoC.

> + compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> + #redistributor-regions = <1>;
> + reg = <0 0x12200000 0 0x10000>, //GICD
> + <0 0x12280000 0 0x80000>, //GICR
> + <0 0x40440000 0 0x1000>; //GICC

Read DTS coding style and order this correctly.

> + };
> +
> + timer {
> + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> + <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> + <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> + <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
> + arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured;
> + always-on;
> + };
> +
> + soc0: soc@10000000 {
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + soc0_sram: sram@10000000 {
> + compatible = "mmio-sram";
> + reg = <0x0 0x10000000 0x0 0x20000>; /* 128KiB SRAM on soc0 */
> + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x10000000 0x0 0x20000>;
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + no-memory-wc;
> +
> + exported@0 {
> + reg = <0 0x0 0 0x20000>;
> + export;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + syscon0: syscon@12c02000 {
> + compatible = "aspeed,ast2700-scu0", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
> + reg = <0x0 0x12c02000 0x0 0x1000>;
> + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0 0x12c02000 0 0x1000>;
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> +
> + silicon-id@0 {
> + compatible = "aspeed,ast2700-silicon-id", "aspeed,silicon-id";
> + reg = <0 0x0 0 0x4>;
> + };
> +
> + scu_ic0: interrupt-controller@1D0 {

DTS coding style...

> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "aspeed,ast2700-scu-ic0";
> + reg = <0 0x1d0 0 0xc>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 97 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + };
> +
> + scu_ic1: interrupt-controller@1E0 {
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "aspeed,ast2700-scu-ic1";
> + reg = <0 0x1e0 0 0xc>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 98 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + };
> +
> + soc0_rst: reset-controller@200 {
> + reg = <0 0x200 0 0x40>;
> + };
> +
> + soc0_clk: clock-controller@240 {
> + reg = <0 0x240 0 0x1c0>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + };
> +
> + soc1: soc@14000000 {

Wait, what, to socs?

> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + syscon1: syscon@14c02000 {
> + compatible = "aspeed,ast2700-scu1", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
> + reg = <0x0 0x14c02000 0x0 0x1000>;
> + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x14c02000 0x0 0x1000>;
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> +
> + soc1_rst: reset-controller@200 {
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + soc1_clk: clock-controller@240 {
> + reg = <0 0x240 0 0x1c0>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + uart12: serial@14c33b00 {
> + compatible = "ns16550a";
> + reg = <0x0 0x14c33b00 0x0 0x100>;
> + reg-shift = <2>;
> + reg-io-width = <4>;
> + clocks = <&syscon1 SCU1_CLK_GATE_UART12CLK>;
> + no-loopback-test;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";

What is this?

> + };
> + };
> +};
> +

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Next message: Rick Wertenbroek: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: endpoint: Introduce 'get_bar' to map fixed address BARs in EPC"
Previous message: Konrad Dybcio: "Re: [PATCH 0/3] Update Konrad Dybcio's email addresses"
In reply to: Kevin Chen: "[PATCH v1 08/10] arm64: dts: aspeed: Add initial AST27XX device tree"
Next in thread: Kevin Chen: "[PATCH v1 09/10] arm64: dts: aspeed: Add initial AST2700 EVB device tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]