Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] firmware: arm_scmi: Make MBOX transport a standalone driver

[Cristian Marussi]

On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 01:41:04PM +0000, Etienne CARRIERE wrote:
> Hi Cristian,
> 
> On Wednesday, July 10, 2024, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > Make SCMI mailbox transport a standalne driver that can be optionally
> > loaded as a module.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig             |  4 +-
> >  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile            |  3 +-
> >  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h            |  3 --
> >  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c            |  3 --
> >  .../{mailbox.c => scmi_transport_mailbox.c}   | 44 +++++++++++++------
> >  5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >  rename drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/{mailbox.c => scmi_transport_mailbox.c} (88%)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig
> > index aa5842be19b2..135e34aefd70 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig
> > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ config ARM_SCMI_HAVE_MSG
> >            available.
> >  
> >  config ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_MAILBOX
> > -       bool "SCMI transport based on Mailbox"
> > +       tristate "SCMI transport based on Mailbox"
> >          depends on MAILBOX
> >          select ARM_SCMI_HAVE_TRANSPORT
> >          select ARM_SCMI_HAVE_SHMEM
> > @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ config ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_MAILBOX
> >  
> >            If you want the ARM SCMI PROTOCOL stack to include support for a
> >            transport based on mailboxes, answer Y.
> > +         This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module
> 
> Nitpicking: replace the 2 space char before "if so," with a single one?
> Applies also to patch 5/8, 6/8 and 7/8.
> 

Fixed in V3.

> Other wise LGTM , but my comment on patch 3/8 that would affect
> use of DEFINE_SCMI_TRANSPORT_DRIVER() in patch 5 to 7.
> 

Yes I reworked the macros params.

Thanks,
Cristian