Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/13] 6.1.102-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 20:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.102 release.
> There are 13 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:27:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.102-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>

## Build
* kernel: 6.1.102-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: dc0e6d516f8a1f3321312ba50a0750559f9dc526
* git describe: v6.1.101-14-gdc0e6d516f8a
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.101-14-gdc0e6d516f8a

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.100-106-gef20ea3e5a9f)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.100-106-gef20ea3e5a9f)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.100-106-gef20ea3e5a9f)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.100-106-gef20ea3e5a9f)

## Test result summary
total: 47994, pass: 37873, fail: 907, skip: 9174, xfail: 40

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 133 total, 133 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kunit
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org