RE: [PATCH 0/7] minmax: reduce compilation time

[David Laight]

From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: 26 July 2024 19:24
> 
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 at 11:13, Lorenzo Stoakes
> <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > 5,447,539       ./arch/x86/xen/setup.o.pre
> 
> Can you perhaps do some kind of "max expansion" on all the
> preprocessor files (you seem to have done it by changing the ".c.o"
> rule to just spit it out as "o.pre", which sounds fine).
> 
> For example, this trivial patch seems to fix the setup.c expansion by
> about an order of magnitude (ie 50M -> 5M).
> 
> Entirely untested, but looks ObviouslyCorrect(tm) to me.

-	extra_pages = min3(EXTRA_MEM_RATIO * min(max_pfn, PFN_DOWN(MAXMEM)),
-			   extra_pages, max_pages - max_pfn);
+	maxmem_pages = EXTRA_MEM_RATIO * min(max_pfn, PFN_DOWN(MAXMEM));
+	extra_pages = min3(maxmem_pages, extra_pages, max_pages - max_pfn);

I suspect just reordering to:
	extra_pages = min3(extra_pages, max_pages - max_pfn,
		EXTRA_MEM_RATIO * min(max_pfn, PFN_DOWN(MAXMEM)));
will have a similar effect.

I'll try to do a v2 of the patchset tomorrow.
- I'll leave __is_constexpr() with its current define (for now).
- Fix the issue the build robot fount.
- Fix the typo in min3().
- use auto_type for min/max functions.

Once that lot is in I'll do some further changes for 'next'.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)