Re: [syzbot] [net?] [s390?] possible deadlock in smc_switch_to_fallback (2)

From: syzbot
Date: Sat Jul 27 2024 - 13:46:36 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "[tip:irq/urgent] BUILD SUCCESS 81a91abab1307d7725fa4620952c0767beae7753"
Previous message: Alex Lanzano: "Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/tiny: Add driver for Sharp Memory LCD"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit: 1722389b0d86 Merge tag 'net-6.11-rc1' of git://git.kernel...
git tree: net-next
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10affabd980000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=5efb917b1462a973
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=bef85a6996d1737c1a2f
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=14d70365980000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=17565655980000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f6e80669686a/disk-1722389b.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/ee658b141f49/vmlinux-1722389b.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/35cfa877b1af/bzImage-1722389b.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+bef85a6996d1737c1a2f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.10.0-syzkaller-12562-g1722389b0d86 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor383/5226 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888022c58a50 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_switch_to_fallback+0x35/0xd00 net/smc/af_smc.c:902

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888022c58258 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
ffff888022c58258 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smc_sendmsg+0x55/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:2773

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
lock_sock_nested+0x48/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3543
do_ip_setsockopt+0x1a2d/0x3cd0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1078
ip_setsockopt+0x63/0x100 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1417
do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2324
__sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2347
__do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2356 [inline]
__se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2353 [inline]
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2353
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #1 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
start_sync_thread+0xdc/0x2dc0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1761
do_ip_vs_set_ctl+0x442/0x13d0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:2732
nf_setsockopt+0x295/0x2c0 net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:101
smc_setsockopt+0x275/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3072
do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2324
__sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2347
__do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2356 [inline]
__se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2353 [inline]
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2353
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
smc_switch_to_fallback+0x35/0xd00 net/smc/af_smc.c:902
smc_sendmsg+0x11f/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:2779
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:745
__sys_sendto+0x3a4/0x4f0 net/socket.c:2204
__do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2216 [inline]
__se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2212 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendto+0xde/0x100 net/socket.c:2212
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
&smc->clcsock_release_lock --> rtnl_mutex --> sk_lock-AF_INET

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
lock(rtnl_mutex);
lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor383/5226:
#0: ffff888022c58258 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
#0: ffff888022c58258 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smc_sendmsg+0x55/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:2773

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5226 Comm: syz-executor383 Not tainted 6.10.0-syzkaller-12562-g1722389b0d86 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/27/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2186
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3133 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3252 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868
__lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
smc_switch_to_fallback+0x35/0xd00 net/smc/af_smc.c:902
smc_sendmsg+0x11f/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:2779
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:745
__sys_sendto+0x3a4/0x4f0 net/socket.c:2204
__do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2216 [inline]
__se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2212 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendto+0xde/0x100 net/socket.c:2212
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f1c3ca27ab9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 c1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fffe06c23b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f1c3ca27ab9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007f1c3ca9a5f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 00000000200007fd R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 431bde82d7b634db R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001
</TASK>

---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

Next message: kernel test robot: "[tip:irq/urgent] BUILD SUCCESS 81a91abab1307d7725fa4620952c0767beae7753"
Previous message: Alex Lanzano: "Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/tiny: Add driver for Sharp Memory LCD"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]