Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to avoid use-after-free in f2fs_stop_gc_thread()

From: Chao Yu
Date: Sun Jul 28 2024 - 21:12:06 EST


On 2024/7/27 23:27, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/27, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 07/25, Chao Yu wrote:
syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below:

__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
print_report+0xe8/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:491
kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601
kasan_check_range+0x282/0x290 mm/kasan/generic.c:189
instrument_atomic_read_write include/linux/instrumented.h:96 [inline]
atomic_fetch_add_relaxed include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:252 [inline]
__refcount_add include/linux/refcount.h:184 [inline]
__refcount_inc include/linux/refcount.h:241 [inline]
refcount_inc include/linux/refcount.h:258 [inline]
get_task_struct include/linux/sched/task.h:118 [inline]
kthread_stop+0xca/0x630 kernel/kthread.c:704
f2fs_stop_gc_thread+0x65/0xb0 fs/f2fs/gc.c:210
f2fs_do_shutdown+0x192/0x540 fs/f2fs/file.c:2283
f2fs_ioc_shutdown fs/f2fs/file.c:2325 [inline]
__f2fs_ioctl+0x443a/0xbe60 fs/f2fs/file.c:4325
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

The root cause is below race condition, it may cause use-after-free
issue in sbi->gc_th pointer.

- remount
- f2fs_remount
- f2fs_stop_gc_thread
- kfree(gc_th)
- f2fs_ioc_shutdown
- f2fs_do_shutdown
- f2fs_stop_gc_thread
- kthread_stop(gc_th->f2fs_gc_task)

We will call f2fs_do_shutdown() in two paths:
- for f2fs_ioc_shutdown() path, we should grab sb->s_umount semaphore
for fixing.
- for f2fs_shutdown() path, it's safe since caller has already grabbed
sb->s_umount semaphore.

Reported-by: syzbot+1a8e2b31f2ac9bd3d148@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/0000000000005c7ccb061e032b9b@xxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 7950e9ac638e ("f2fs: stop gc/discard thread after fs shutdown")
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/f2fs/file.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 7a37f2b393b9..62d72da25754 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -2388,7 +2388,10 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_shutdown(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
}
}
+ /* grab sb->s_umount to avoid racing w/ remount() */
+ down_read(&sbi->sb->s_umount);

Is this safe for freeze_bdev()?

bdev_freeze
-> fs_bdev_freeze
-> get_bdev_super
-> bdev_super_lock(bdev, true)
-> super_lock(sb, true)
-> __super_lock(sb, true)
-> down_write(s_umount)

Oops, let me check this.

Thanks,



ret = f2fs_do_shutdown(sbi, in, readonly);
+ up_read(&sbi->sb->s_umount);
if (need_drop)
mnt_drop_write_file(filp);
--
2.40.1