Re: [PATCH] KVM: Loongarch: Remove undefined a6 argument comment for kvm_hypercall

[maobibo]

On 2024/7/29 上午11:03, WangYuli wrote:
> Hi Bibo and Huacai,
>
>
> Ah... tell me you two aren't arguing, right?
>
>
> Both of you are working towards the same goal—making the upstream
>
> code for the Loongarch architecture as clean and elegant as possible.
>
> If it's just a disagreement about how to handle this small patch,
>
> there's no need to make things complicated.
>
>
> As a partner of yours and a community developer passionate about
>
> Loongson CPU, I'd much rather see you two working together
>
> harmoniously than complaining about each other's work. I have full
>
> confidence in Bibo's judgment on the direction of KVM for Loongarch,
>
> and I also believe that Huacai, as the Loongarch maintainer, has always
>
> been fulfilling his responsibilities.
>
>
> You are both excellent Linux developers. That's all.
>
>
> To be specific about the controversy caused by this particular commit,
>
> I think the root cause is that the KVM documentation for Loongarch
>
> hasn't been upstreamed. In my opinion, the documentation seems
>
> ready to be upstreamed. If you're all busy with more important work,
>
> I can take the time to submit them and provide a Chinese translation.
>
>
> If this is feasible, it would be better to merge this commit after that.
Yuli,

The argument is normal in the work and life :)

You are right, KVM document is important and any contribution is welcome.

Regards
Bibo Mao
> Best wishes,
>
>
> --
>
> WangYuli