Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mm: zswap: fix global shrinker memcg iteration

[Takero Funaki]

2024年7月30日(火) 3:24 Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 4:06 PM Takero Funaki <flintglass@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This patch fixes an issue where the zswap global shrinker stopped
> > iterating through the memcg tree.
> >
> > The problem was that shrink_worker() would restart iterating memcg tree
> > from the tree root, considering an offline memcg as a failure, and abort
> > shrinking after encountering the same offline memcg 16 times even if
> > there is only one offline memcg. After this change, an offline memcg in
> > the tree is no longer considered a failure. This allows the shrinker to
> > continue shrinking the other online memcgs regardless of whether an
> > offline memcg exists, gives higher zswap writeback activity.
> >
> > To avoid holding refcount of offline memcg encountered during the memcg
> > tree walking, shrink_worker() must continue iterating to release the
> > offline memcg to ensure the next memcg stored in the cursor is online.
> >
> > The offline memcg cleaner has also been changed to avoid the same issue.
> > When the next memcg of the offlined memcg is also offline, the refcount
> > stored in the iteration cursor was held until the next shrink_worker()
> > run. The cleaner must release the offline memcg recursively.
> >
> > Fixes: a65b0e7607cc ("zswap: make shrinking memcg-aware")
> > Signed-off-by: Takero Funaki <flintglass@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  mm/zswap.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
> > index adeaf9c97fde..e9b5343256cd 100644
> > --- a/mm/zswap.c
> > +++ b/mm/zswap.c
> > @@ -765,12 +765,31 @@ void zswap_folio_swapin(struct folio *folio)
> >         }
> >  }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * This function should be called when a memcg is being offlined.
> > + *
> > + * Since the global shrinker shrink_worker() may hold a reference
> > + * of the memcg, we must check and release the reference in
> > + * zswap_next_shrink.
> > + *
> > + * shrink_worker() must handle the case where this function releases
> > + * the reference of memcg being shrunk.
> > + */
> >  void zswap_memcg_offline_cleanup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >  {
> >         /* lock out zswap shrinker walking memcg tree */
> >         spin_lock(&zswap_shrink_lock);
> > -       if (zswap_next_shrink == memcg)
> > -               zswap_next_shrink = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, zswap_next_shrink, NULL);
> > +       if (zswap_next_shrink == memcg) {
> > +               do {
> > +                       zswap_next_shrink = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, zswap_next_shrink, NULL);
> > +               } while (zswap_next_shrink && !mem_cgroup_online(zswap_next_shrink));
> > +               /*
> > +                * We verified the next memcg is online.  Even if the next
> > +                * memcg is being offlined here, another cleaner must be
> > +                * waiting for our lock.  We can leave the online memcg
> > +                * reference.
> > +                */
>
> I thought we agreed to drop this comment :)
>
> > +       }
> >         spin_unlock(&zswap_shrink_lock);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -1304,43 +1323,49 @@ static void shrink_worker(struct work_struct *w)
> >         /* Reclaim down to the accept threshold */
> >         thr = zswap_accept_thr_pages();
> >
> > -       /* global reclaim will select cgroup in a round-robin fashion. */
> > +       /* global reclaim will select cgroup in a round-robin fashion.
>
> nit: s/global/Global
>
> > +        *
> > +        * We save iteration cursor memcg into zswap_next_shrink,
> > +        * which can be modified by the offline memcg cleaner
> > +        * zswap_memcg_offline_cleanup().
> > +        *
> > +        * Since the offline cleaner is called only once, we cannot leave an
> > +        * offline memcg reference in zswap_next_shrink.
> > +        * We can rely on the cleaner only if we get online memcg under lock.
> > +        *
> > +        * If we get an offline memcg, we cannot determine if the cleaner has
> > +        * already been called or will be called later. We must put back the
> > +        * reference before returning from this function. Otherwise, the
> > +        * offline memcg left in zswap_next_shrink will hold the reference
> > +        * until the next run of shrink_worker().
> > +        */
> >         do {
> >                 spin_lock(&zswap_shrink_lock);
> > -               zswap_next_shrink = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, zswap_next_shrink, NULL);
> > -               memcg = zswap_next_shrink;
> >
> >                 /*
> > -                * We need to retry if we have gone through a full round trip, or if we
> > -                * got an offline memcg (or else we risk undoing the effect of the
> > -                * zswap memcg offlining cleanup callback). This is not catastrophic
> > -                * per se, but it will keep the now offlined memcg hostage for a while.
> > -                *
> > +                * Start shrinking from the next memcg after zswap_next_shrink.
> > +                * When the offline cleaner has already advanced the cursor,
> > +                * advancing the cursor here overlooks one memcg, but this
> > +                * should be negligibly rare.
> > +                */
> > +               do {
> > +                       memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, zswap_next_shrink, NULL);
> > +                       zswap_next_shrink = memcg;
> > +               } while (memcg && !mem_cgroup_tryget_online(memcg));
>
> Let's move spin_lock() and spin_unlock() to be right above and before
> the do-while loop, similar to zswap_memcg_offline_cleanup(). This
> should make it more obvious what the lock is protecting.
>
> Actually, maybe it would be cleaner at this point to move the
> iteration to find the next online memcg under lock into a helper, and
> use it here and in zswap_memcg_offline_cleanup(). zswap_shrink_lock
> and zswap_next_shrink can be made static to this helper and maybe some
> of the comments could live there instead. Something like
> zswap_next_shrink_memcg().
>
> This will abstract this whole iteration logic and make shrink_worker()
> significantly easier to follow. WDYT?
>
> I can do that in a followup cleanup patch if you prefer this as well.
>

I'd really appreciate it. Sorry to have kept you waiting for a novice
coder. Thank you for all your comments and support.